[COMMIT] Re: [PATCH] obvious (I think) correction to compiler.c and compiler.cc

[Paul Gilliam <pgilliam@us.ibm.com>]

Done.

Was this obvious and I was too cautious?

-=# Paul #=-

PS. should I have copied the patch here or is the reference enough?


On Monday 07 March 2005 10:50, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 10:39:16AM -0800, Paul Gilliam wrote:
> > This fixes a problem with this committed patch:
> >
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2005-03/msg00050.htm
> >
> > 'compiler.c' and 'compiler.cc' where doing the right thing, but
> > get_compiler_info was not evaluating the key line because it did not
> > begin with 'set'.   Rather then add another case to get_compiler_info, I
> > changed the the line in compiler.c and compiler.cc to be 'set need_a_set
> > [regsub....]'
> >
> > At first I thought this was obvious, but because it could be fixed in
> > compiler.c and compiler.cc or fixed in get_compiler_info, I thought maybe
> > it wasn't so obvious.  I fixed it here in compiler.c and compiler.cc
> > because those are compiler dependent and get_compiler_info is more
> > generic.
> >
> > OK to commit?
>
> OK.