Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
To: kewarken@qnx.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Revised: [patch] general updates and improvements to QNX NTO support
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 00:52:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200412082219.iB8MJi18008804@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41B47B26.2060905@qnx.com> (message from Kris Warkentin on Mon, 06 Dec 2004 10:30:46 -0500)

   Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 10:30:46 -0500
   From: Kris Warkentin <kewarken@qnx.com>

   Based on Mark's comments, I've refactored this patch to provide a 
   cleaner interface to nto_tdep.c.  I created an nto_set_target function 
   so that the targets can initialize their own nto_target_ops and set the 
   target properly rather than initializing current_nto_target.

Thanks.  That looks good!  I still think you should avoid the

   #define nto_xxx_yyy (current_nto_target.xxx_yyy)

defines.  They're hiding the fact that you're using a global variable.
Consider a patch that uses current_nto_target.xxx_yyy directly
pre-approved.  I've got one additional nit, please see below.

   I thought about completely hiding the implementation by turning all the 
   macros into functions which just call the current target functions but 
   I'm not sure if it's worth it.  Specifically I'm thinking about cases 
   where other modules need access to members of current_nto_target.  For 
   instance, the remote and procfs modules need to set various flags and 
   hooks so if I were to hide current_nto_target, I'd need setter/getter 
   functions.  Certainly that is the cleaner 'OO' approach.  If it needs 
   changing later, I might also store a list of targets in nto-tdep.c.  It 
   doesn't seem like a high priority right now though since we probably 
   won't be multi-arching our gdb any time soon.

This can be done when the need arises.

   +enum gdb_osabi
   +nto_elf_osabi_sniffer (bfd *abfd)
   +{
   +  if (nto_is_nto_target)
   +    {
   +      return nto_is_nto_target (abfd);
   +    }
   +  return GDB_OSABI_UNKNOWN;
   +}
   +

Could you remove the redundant braces here?  With that change, this is
OK.

Thanks,

Mark


  reply	other threads:[~2004-12-08 22:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-19 20:47 Kris Warkentin
2004-11-26 20:37 ` Ping: " Kris Warkentin
2004-12-03 16:09   ` Kris Warkentin
2004-12-03 16:17     ` Mark Kettenis
2004-12-03 17:01       ` Kris Warkentin
2004-12-03 17:23         ` Kris Warkentin
2004-12-03 17:44         ` Mark Kettenis
2004-12-06 16:53           ` Revised: " Kris Warkentin
2004-12-09  0:52             ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2004-12-09 15:45               ` Kris Warkentin
2004-12-09 22:31                 ` Mark Kettenis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200412082219.iB8MJi18008804@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
    --to=kettenis@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=kewarken@qnx.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox