From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, cagney@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [commit] Add add_setshow_enum_cmd, use in mips
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 05:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041111053707.GA9394@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01c4c780$Blat.v2.2.2$bbe98080@zahav.net.il>
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 01:54:16AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > We can't improve the code quality and design, which have suffered over
> > time, if we can't make progress on patches. Indeed, the longer it
> > takes for every single change to go in, the less incentive there is to
> > clean anything up! I'm sure losing incentive to fix things.
>
> Then let's abandon the patch reviewing procedure completely and just
> commit whatever each one of us global maintainers finds appropriate.
> There are projects that actually work that way (Emacs, for example).
> I have no problem with that, as long as it is consistent and
> documented.
I've suggested something along those lines (not "abandoning patch
reviewing", but giving more authority to the global maintainers)
several times in the past, and met with mixed responses. I hope to
eventually discuss this question with the GDB Steering Committee, and
get the result documented, one way or another.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-11 5:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-30 17:11 Andrew Cagney
2004-10-30 23:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-10-31 23:01 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-01 4:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-01 5:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-01 21:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-01 22:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-02 4:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-09 1:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-09 5:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-09 15:29 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-09 18:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-10 4:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-10 20:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-10 21:42 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-11-10 23:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-10 23:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-11 0:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-11 5:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2004-11-11 5:59 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041111053707.GA9394@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox