From: "Amit S. Kale" <amitkale@linsyssoft.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: kgdb support for gdb
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 15:42:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200410042111.33306.amitkale@linsyssoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <416168C5.6010601@gnu.org>
On Monday 04 Oct 2004 8:44 pm, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > Index: src/gdb/remote.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- src.orig/gdb/remote.c 2004-09-25 01:21:18.000000000 +0530
> > +++ src/gdb/remote.c 2004-10-01 12:58:49.000000000 +0530
> > @@ -271,12 +271,13 @@
> >
> > /* Default maximum number of characters in a packet body. Many
> > remote stubs have a hardwired buffer size of 400 bytes
> > - (c.f. BUFMAX in m68k-stub.c and i386-stub.c). BUFMAX-1 is used
> > + (c.f. BUFMAX in m68k-stub.c and i386-stub.c).
> > + BUFMAX is defined as 1024 in most kgdb stubs. BUFMAX-1 is used
> > as the maximum packet-size to ensure that the packet and an extra
> > NUL character can always fit in the buffer. This stops GDB
> > trashing stubs that try to squeeze an extra NUL into what is
> > already a full buffer (As of 1999-12-04 that was most stubs. */
> > - rs->remote_packet_size = 400 - 1;
> > + rs->remote_packet_size = 1024 - 1;
> >
> > /* Should rs->sizeof_g_packet needs more space than the
> > default, adjust the size accordingly. Remember that each byte is
>
> As the comment explains, the change is wrong. Can I suggest starting a
> new thread on gdb@ explaining the underlying problem that you're trying
> to fix here (however, can you also delay it a bit, gdb@'s currently
> dominated by MI questions).
No problem!
I'll keep this in mind and bring this point up in the next round of
discussions? I have to first work on the changes suggested by Mark K.
-Amit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-04 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-01 7:45 Amit S. Kale
2004-10-01 9:13 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-10-01 9:57 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-10-01 22:01 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-10-02 3:52 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-10-02 22:48 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-10-04 14:56 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-10-19 12:45 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-10-04 15:14 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-10-04 15:42 ` Amit S. Kale [this message]
2004-10-19 12:55 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-10-04 15:55 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-10-04 16:36 ` Amit S. Kale
2004-10-04 17:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-10-25 5:50 ` Amit S. Kale
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200410042111.33306.amitkale@linsyssoft.com \
--to=amitkale@linsyssoft.com \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox