Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* GDB 6.2 branch frozen
@ 2004-07-28 19:55 Andrew Cagney
  2004-07-28 23:53 ` Joel Brobecker
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2004-07-28 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches

I'll spin up what will hopefully be the final draft.

Andrew


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: GDB 6.2 branch frozen
  2004-07-28 19:55 GDB 6.2 branch frozen Andrew Cagney
@ 2004-07-28 23:53 ` Joel Brobecker
  2004-07-29 19:06   ` Andrew Cagney
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2004-07-28 23:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb-patches

> I'll spin up what will hopefully be the final draft.

mips-irix is completely broken. Is that OK? If yes, then we might want
to add a note about this somewhere.

-- 
Joel


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: GDB 6.2 branch frozen
  2004-07-28 23:53 ` Joel Brobecker
@ 2004-07-29 19:06   ` Andrew Cagney
  2004-07-29 20:47     ` Joel Brobecker
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2004-07-29 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joel Brobecker; +Cc: gdb-patches

>>I'll spin up what will hopefully be the final draft.
> 
> 
> mips-irix is completely broken. Is that OK? If yes, then we might want
> to add a note about this somewhere.

Can you be more specific?  Does ``break main; run'' work for instance?

Andrew


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: GDB 6.2 branch frozen
  2004-07-29 19:06   ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2004-07-29 20:47     ` Joel Brobecker
  2004-07-29 21:13       ` Andrew Cagney
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2004-07-29 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb-patches

> >mips-irix is completely broken. Is that OK? If yes, then we might want
> >to add a note about this somewhere.
> 
> Can you be more specific?  Does ``break main; run'' work for instance?

Unfortunately, no (for that one, you'll need my bfd patch).

-- 
Joel


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: GDB 6.2 branch frozen
  2004-07-29 20:47     ` Joel Brobecker
@ 2004-07-29 21:13       ` Andrew Cagney
  2004-07-29 21:24         ` Joel Brobecker
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2004-07-29 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joel Brobecker; +Cc: gdb-patches

>>>mips-irix is completely broken. Is that OK? If yes, then we might want
>>>> >to add a note about this somewhere.
>>
>>> 
>>> Can you be more specific?  Does ``break main; run'' work for instance?
> 
> 
> Unfortunately, no (for that one, you'll need my bfd patch).

Once the BFD patch is applied, what's next to fail?

(so I can write: Due to problems with both BFD and ... GDB 6.2 does not 
work on MIPS IRIX).

Andrew



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: GDB 6.2 branch frozen
  2004-07-29 21:13       ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2004-07-29 21:24         ` Joel Brobecker
  2004-07-29 22:31           ` [commit/6.2] Mention mips-irix broken; " Andrew Cagney
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2004-07-29 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb-patches

> Once the BFD patch is applied, what's next to fail?

I think the next biggie is the unwinder. But there is also the problem
with floats that cause GDB to SEGV. The last one is on my plate, but
the patch could still be applied as is. It might not be perfect (we
need to check) but at least it prevents the crash.

References:
    http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-07/msg00288.html
    http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-07/msg00319.html
    http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-07/msg00310.html
    
-- 
Joel


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [commit/6.2] Mention mips-irix broken; Re: GDB 6.2 branch frozen
  2004-07-29 21:24         ` Joel Brobecker
@ 2004-07-29 22:31           ` Andrew Cagney
  2004-07-29 23:16             ` Mark Kettenis
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2004-07-29 22:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joel Brobecker; +Cc: gdb-patches

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 666 bytes --]

I've committed the attached (this sort of late breaking news is exactly 
what PROBLEMS is for :-)

Andrew

>>Once the BFD patch is applied, what's next to fail?
> 
> 
> I think the next biggie is the unwinder. But there is also the problem
> with floats that cause GDB to SEGV. The last one is on my plate, but
> the patch could still be applied as is. It might not be perfect (we
> need to check) but at least it prevents the crash.
> 
> References:
>     http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-07/msg00288.html
>     http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-07/msg00319.html
>     http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-07/msg00310.html
>     


[-- Attachment #2: diffs --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 833 bytes --]

2004-07-29  Andrew Cagney  <cagney@gnu.org>

	* PROBLEMS (mips-irix): Note that it is broken.

Index: PROBLEMS
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/PROBLEMS,v
retrieving revision 1.31.2.4
diff -p -u -r1.31.2.4 PROBLEMS
--- PROBLEMS	28 Jul 2004 19:51:42 -0000	1.31.2.4
+++ PROBLEMS	29 Jul 2004 22:28:37 -0000
@@ -39,6 +39,12 @@ complete, hitting Control-C does not hav
 The command execution is not aborted, and the "QUIT" message confirming
 the abortion is displayed only after the command has been completed.
 
+mips-irix broken:
+
+Due to problems with both BFD (sections not being correctly
+recognized) and GDB (backtraces failing), GDB 6.2 does not work on
+MIPS IRIX.
+
 *** C++ support
 
 gdb/931: GDB could be more generous when reading types C++ templates on input

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [commit/6.2] Mention mips-irix broken; Re: GDB 6.2 branch frozen
  2004-07-29 22:31           ` [commit/6.2] Mention mips-irix broken; " Andrew Cagney
@ 2004-07-29 23:16             ` Mark Kettenis
  2004-07-29 23:26               ` Andrew Cagney
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mark Kettenis @ 2004-07-29 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cagney; +Cc: brobecker, gdb-patches

   Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:31:47 -0400
   From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>

   I've committed the attached (this sort of late breaking news is exactly 
   what PROBLEMS is for :-)

Hmm.  NetBSD/mips is broken too.  Can you sneak in something about
that too?

Mark


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [commit/6.2] Mention mips-irix broken; Re: GDB 6.2 branch frozen
  2004-07-29 23:16             ` Mark Kettenis
@ 2004-07-29 23:26               ` Andrew Cagney
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2004-07-29 23:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Kettenis; +Cc: brobecker, gdb-patches

>    Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:31:47 -0400
>    From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
> 
>    I've committed the attached (this sort of late breaking news is exactly 
>    what PROBLEMS is for :-)
> 
> Hmm.  NetBSD/mips is broken too.  Can you sneak in something about
> that too?

The tarball's hit sourceware :-(  I'll add it to the announcement but it 
won't be in the tarball.

Andrew



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-07-29 23:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-07-28 19:55 GDB 6.2 branch frozen Andrew Cagney
2004-07-28 23:53 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-07-29 19:06   ` Andrew Cagney
2004-07-29 20:47     ` Joel Brobecker
2004-07-29 21:13       ` Andrew Cagney
2004-07-29 21:24         ` Joel Brobecker
2004-07-29 22:31           ` [commit/6.2] Mention mips-irix broken; " Andrew Cagney
2004-07-29 23:16             ` Mark Kettenis
2004-07-29 23:26               ` Andrew Cagney

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox