Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] mips-irix SEGV: long doubles are 128 bits long on IRIX
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 02:09:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040722020854.GT1278@gnat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040722004808.GB27215@nevyn.them.org>

> According to GCC long double is 128-bit for all n64 and n32 targets.

OK. So I am planning on setting the size to 128-bit for the following
ABIs, is this the correct list:
   . O64 (??? Didn't see any mention of this in the IRIX man pages)
   . EABI32, EABI64
   . N32/N64
I will add the same set_gdbarch_...() call in each section of the case
statement on mips_abi.

Would that be the correct patch?

I am making extra sure before doing the testing because running the
testsuite takes several hours even after my fixes (it was even worse
before, it was taking 9-10 hours, and I think this is because of bugs
in expect/dejagnu that don't detect when the debugger dies or when
the debugger expects an answer from the user after having reported
an internal error - I just don't want to go there and fix the problems
in GDB instead). And to make things worse, the run sometimes get
screwed up for some reason I don't understand.  So I want to do
the testing overnight if I can and try to avoid any unecessary run.

Thanks,
-- 
Joel


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-07-22  2:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-21 21:25 Joel Brobecker
2004-07-21 21:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-07-21 23:33   ` Joel Brobecker
2004-07-22  0:40     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-07-22  0:46       ` Joel Brobecker
2004-07-22  0:49         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
     [not found]           ` <mailpost.1090457371.25819@news-sj1-1>
2004-07-22  1:19             ` cgd
2004-07-22  1:27               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-07-22  2:09           ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2004-07-22  2:21             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-07-22  2:34               ` Joel Brobecker
2004-07-22  2:36                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-07-23 17:00 David Anderson
2004-07-26 22:18 ` Andrew Cagney
     [not found]   ` <mailpost.1090880398.10041@news-sj1-1>
2004-07-26 22:41     ` cgd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040722020854.GT1278@gnat.com \
    --to=brobecker@gnat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox