Re: [PATCH]: Updates to Ada sources, part 1 (longish)

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>]

On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 11:37:43AM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > The ChangeLog entry should provide a summary of what was added/changed
> > at this point in time - stuff like listing the new functions and summary 
> > of changed functions.   Can we do that?
> 
> What I was saying was that it's going to be a non-trivial amount of time
> to prepare that monster changelog entry. If you (the maintainers) think
> it is necessary then, fine, we'll do it. But I'd much rather see this
> time used to other things as I don't think the benefits of this
> particular task will outweight the cost. But it's the maintainers call.

Personally, I don't think it's worthwhile.  These files are still not
built in the FSF tree.  Until they are, I think they have the moral
equivalent of a changelog entry that says "New file".  Once they are
built, naturally, they'll be change controlled like anything else.

Just my opinion.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz