From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA/RFC] New command: ``start''
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 15:39:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040519153916.GE10684@gnat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40AB6F65.4070603@gnu.org>
> I just went to describe this new command and found I was struggling with
> ``start'' (I described it as ``run-to''). Given this, and more
> importantly given that ``runto'' is already a part of our vocabulary
> ((with "runto_main" in the testsuite) would ``runto'' be a better name?
``runto'' strikes me as an imcomplete command name (runto what?).
Personally, I much prefer ``start''. I've been using ``begin'' for the
past 3 years so I'm so used to it that I thought it would be a problem
switching to the new command name, but within the two hours or
implementing and testing it, I grew to love it more.
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-19 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-18 2:47 Joel Brobecker
2004-05-18 6:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-18 17:05 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-05-18 18:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-18 19:03 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-05-19 5:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-18 19:22 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-05-18 21:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-18 22:27 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-05-18 22:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-19 15:36 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-05-19 15:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-19 16:10 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-05-20 1:01 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-05-20 5:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-20 13:46 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-20 16:03 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-05-20 17:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-20 20:33 ` Paul Gilliam
2004-05-20 22:12 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-05-21 0:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-21 1:31 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-05-24 22:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-05-24 23:57 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-05-19 14:30 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-05-19 15:39 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2004-05-19 20:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-21 18:57 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-05-18 19:30 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-05-18 19:45 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-05-18 20:21 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040519153916.GE10684@gnat.com \
--to=brobecker@gnat.com \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox