From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joel Brobecker To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/RFC] New command: ``start'' Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 15:39:00 -0000 Message-id: <20040519153916.GE10684@gnat.com> References: <20040518024700.GV10684@gnat.com> <40AB6F65.4070603@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-05/msg00573.html > I just went to describe this new command and found I was struggling with > ``start'' (I described it as ``run-to''). Given this, and more > importantly given that ``runto'' is already a part of our vocabulary > ((with "runto_main" in the testsuite) would ``runto'' be a better name? ``runto'' strikes me as an imcomplete command name (runto what?). Personally, I much prefer ``start''. I've been using ``begin'' for the past 3 years so I'm so used to it that I thought it would be a problem switching to the new command name, but within the two hours or implementing and testing it, I grew to love it more. -- Joel