Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Randolph Chung <randolph@tausq.org>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc/hppa] handle setting gp for calling shlib functions
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 16:13:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040429161357.GA3965@tausq.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <409126FD.3080708@gnu.org>

> > Unfortunately the func_addr that is passed
> >into push_dummy_call is already the canonicalized function address,
> >so i cannot do this as part of e.g. find_global_pointer.
> 
> For PPC64 I used ABI knowledge to do a code address -> descriptor 
> address reverse lookup.  Can you do something similar?

you mean look through a opd section? unfortunately there isn't such a
thing for the 32-bit abi. it's there in hppa64. 

for hppa32, the plabel likely resides in the got/plt, and i don't think
we can easily find it there.

> Anyway, a thing-to-do-one day is to pass the function's ``value'' 
> (descriptor and type) to push-dummy-call (there has been talk of doing 
> this before).  Another is to clean up what's passed as the parameter 
> list -> again descriptors.

well, i can already do this, by *not* implementing the conversion
function. However, when the actual call is made, we need to do the
conversion.

how about adding a new gdbarch method breakpoint_from_func_ptr 
and potentially not calling convert_from_func_ptr_address() from
call_function_by_hand()? other than ia64, ppc64 and hppa, how many
function-descriptor archs do we have?

randolph
-- 
Randolph Chung
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, hppa/ia64 ports
http://www.tausq.org/


  reply	other threads:[~2004-04-29 16:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-29  6:23 Randolph Chung
2004-04-29 14:12 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-04-29 15:07   ` Randolph Chung
2004-04-29 16:02     ` Andrew Cagney
2004-04-29 16:13       ` Randolph Chung [this message]
2004-04-29 16:48         ` Andrew Cagney
2004-04-30  4:04           ` Randolph Chung
2004-04-30 14:25             ` Andrew Cagney
2004-05-04 14:03               ` Andrew Cagney
2004-05-04 14:10                 ` Randolph Chung
2004-05-04 14:34                   ` Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040429161357.GA3965@tausq.org \
    --to=randolph@tausq.org \
    --cc=cagney@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox