From: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add-symbol-file-from-memory command
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 22:42:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200404082242.i38Mgoek011882@magilla.sf.frob.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Andrew Cagney's message of Thursday, 8 April 2004 18:35:14 -0400 <4075D3A2.9020704@gnu.org>
> > + nbfd = bfd_elf_bfd_from_remote_memory (templ, addr, &loadbase,
> > + target_read_memory);
>
> Roland, FYI,
>
> This is another of those bits of infrastructure that someone dropped.
> With 6.1 out (I can't yet announce it) I'm picking it up and sorting it out.
>
> So the interface might change slightly but not by much.
Can you be specific? The bfd_elf_bfd_from_remote_memory code in BFD now
works just fine. There is a standing suggestion from Jim to change the
signature of the TARGET_READ_MEMORY function pointer argument, which is
certainly fine (and two minutes' work). I would be happy to prepare that
change right away if it's what people want.
I don't know of any other way in which this might be considered "dropped"
or "not sorted out". If there is anything else you have in mind, please
tell me about it.
Thanks,
Roland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-08 22:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-08 20:47 Roland McGrath
2004-04-08 22:13 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-08 22:28 ` Roland McGrath
2004-04-08 22:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-04-08 22:35 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-04-08 22:42 ` Roland McGrath [this message]
2004-04-15 18:52 ` Andrew Cagney
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-08 22:38 Roland McGrath
2004-04-15 18:11 ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-15 18:49 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-04-15 21:42 ` Roland McGrath
2004-02-12 0:34 Roland McGrath
2004-02-13 15:54 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-13 19:13 ` Roland McGrath
2004-02-02 3:38 Roland McGrath
2004-02-02 4:06 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-02 4:47 ` Roland McGrath
2004-02-02 15:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-02 23:31 ` Roland McGrath
2004-02-02 23:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-02 6:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-02-02 7:35 ` Roland McGrath
2004-02-02 17:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-10-03 4:27 Roland McGrath
2003-10-03 21:41 ` Jim Blandy
2003-10-03 21:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-03 22:08 ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-03 22:19 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-10-03 23:00 ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-04 12:57 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-10-04 20:14 ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-07 1:42 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-10-03 22:34 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-10-03 23:02 ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-04 14:39 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-10-06 15:30 ` Jim Blandy
2003-10-06 15:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-06 19:57 ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-07 23:32 ` Michael Snyder
2003-05-20 7:01 Roland McGrath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200404082242.i38Mgoek011882@magilla.sf.frob.com \
--to=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox