From: Ulrich Weigand <weigand@i1.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
To: cagney@gnu.org (Andrew Cagney)
Cc: weigand@i1.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Ulrich Weigand),
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix gdb1476.exp on s390*
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 19:05:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200403221905.UAA12203@faui1d.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <405F20C5.7040700@gnu.org> from "Andrew Cagney" at Mar 22, 2004 12:22:13 PM
Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > this patch fixes the gdb.base/gdb1476.exp test case (backtrace from NULL
> > function pointer call).
> >
> > When calling via an invalid function pointer, what we should do is simply
> > unwind the PC from the return address register and continue. This is
> > exactly what is done to unwind from a PLT stub as well, so the patch
> > simply uses the PLT frame unwinder to handle this case as well.
>
> While that might be true, I don't know that its the job of something
> called "PLTSTUB".
Yes, the name's a bit unfortunate. What this unwinder does is basically
unwind from any situation where we don't have a proper function prolog.
It could in theory handle all kinds of stubs, trampolines etc.
> I can think of either:
> - renaming pltstub to something that matches its new purpose (just "stub"?)
This would be my preferred solution.
> - using the default unwinder
The default unwinder as it is now would handle the situation incorrectly.
I could build the stub detection logic into the default unwinder, but that
would make it even more complex than it already is; I would think with the
new frame logic it is preferable to have multiple unwinders rather than a
single one that handles everything.
Bye,
Ulrich
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
weigand@informatik.uni-erlangen.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-22 19:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-17 19:18 Ulrich Weigand
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Ulrich Weigand
2004-03-22 17:22 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-22 19:05 ` Ulrich Weigand [this message]
2004-03-22 21:58 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-22 22:20 ` Ulrich Weigand
2004-03-22 22:37 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200403221905.UAA12203@faui1d.informatik.uni-erlangen.de \
--to=weigand@i1.informatik.uni-erlangen.de \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox