From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] breakpoint.c: Don't let adjust_breakpoint_address() adjust watchpoints
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 21:18:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040315141800.33fb721d@saguaro> (raw)
Message-ID: <20040315211800.FR6cQ8k_0or7kv3ghDHCH81UFzE9YpbRdCq9pZtJxgU@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <405614CB.7020708@gnu.org>
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:40:43 -0500
Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org> wrote:
> > * breakpoint.c (adjust_breakpoint_address): Don't adjust
> > breakpoint address for watchpoints or the catch eventpoints.
> > Add new paramter bptype. Adjust all callers.
>
> Is this intended?
>
> > -#if !defined(TARGET_REGION_SIZE_OK_FOR_HW_WATCHPOINT)
> > -#define TARGET_REGION_SIZE_OK_FOR_HW_WATCHPOINT(BYTE_SIZE) \
> > - ((BYTE_SIZE) <= (DEPRECATED_REGISTER_SIZE))
> > -#endif
> > -
>
Oops! Good catch. That bit was not intended for this patch. I'll
submit that separately as an obvious fix. (Since the macro in question
is now defined in target.h.)
Here's the patch again with that bit removed...
* breakpoint.c (adjust_breakpoint_address): Don't adjust
breakpoint address for watchpoints or the catch eventpoints.
Add new paramter bptype. Adjust all callers.
Index: breakpoint.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/breakpoint.c,v
retrieving revision 1.162
diff -u -p -r1.162 breakpoint.c
--- breakpoint.c 28 Feb 2004 16:56:12 -0000 1.162
+++ breakpoint.c 15 Mar 2004 21:12:45 -0000
@@ -99,7 +99,8 @@ static void check_duplicates (struct bre
static void breakpoint_adjustment_warning (CORE_ADDR, CORE_ADDR, int, int);
-static CORE_ADDR adjust_breakpoint_address (CORE_ADDR bpaddr);
+static CORE_ADDR adjust_breakpoint_address (CORE_ADDR bpaddr,
+ enum bptype bptype);
static void describe_other_breakpoints (CORE_ADDR, asection *);
@@ -3947,13 +3948,25 @@ breakpoint_adjustment_warning (CORE_ADDR
this function is simply the identity function. */
static CORE_ADDR
-adjust_breakpoint_address (CORE_ADDR bpaddr)
+adjust_breakpoint_address (CORE_ADDR bpaddr, enum bptype bptype)
{
if (!gdbarch_adjust_breakpoint_address_p (current_gdbarch))
{
/* Very few targets need any kind of breakpoint adjustment. */
return bpaddr;
}
+ else if (bptype == bp_watchpoint
+ || bptype == bp_hardware_watchpoint
+ || bptype == bp_read_watchpoint
+ || bptype == bp_access_watchpoint
+ || bptype == bp_catch_fork
+ || bptype == bp_catch_vfork
+ || bptype == bp_catch_exec)
+ {
+ /* Watchpoints and the various bp_catch_* eventpoints should not
+ have their addresses modified. */
+ return bpaddr;
+ }
else
{
CORE_ADDR adjusted_bpaddr;
@@ -4062,7 +4075,8 @@ set_raw_breakpoint (struct symtab_and_li
memset (b, 0, sizeof (*b));
b->loc = allocate_bp_location (b, bptype);
b->loc->requested_address = sal.pc;
- b->loc->address = adjust_breakpoint_address (b->loc->requested_address);
+ b->loc->address = adjust_breakpoint_address (b->loc->requested_address,
+ bptype);
if (sal.symtab == NULL)
b->source_file = NULL;
else
@@ -4622,7 +4636,8 @@ set_longjmp_resume_breakpoint (CORE_ADDR
if (b->type == bp_longjmp_resume)
{
b->loc->requested_address = pc;
- b->loc->address = adjust_breakpoint_address (b->loc->requested_address);
+ b->loc->address = adjust_breakpoint_address (b->loc->requested_address,
+ b->type);
b->enable_state = bp_enabled;
b->frame_id = frame_id;
check_duplicates (b);
@@ -5879,7 +5894,8 @@ watch_command_1 (char *arg, int accessfl
scope_breakpoint->loc->requested_address
= get_frame_pc (prev_frame);
scope_breakpoint->loc->address
- = adjust_breakpoint_address (scope_breakpoint->loc->requested_address);
+ = adjust_breakpoint_address (scope_breakpoint->loc->requested_address,
+ scope_breakpoint->type);
/* The scope breakpoint is related to the watchpoint. We
will need to act on them together. */
@@ -7190,7 +7206,8 @@ breakpoint_re_set_one (void *bint)
b->line_number = sals.sals[i].line;
b->loc->requested_address = sals.sals[i].pc;
b->loc->address
- = adjust_breakpoint_address (b->loc->requested_address);
+ = adjust_breakpoint_address (b->loc->requested_address,
+ b->type);
/* Used to check for duplicates here, but that can
cause trouble, as it doesn't check for disabled
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-15 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-15 20:30 Kevin Buettner
2004-03-15 21:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-03-15 21:35 ` Kevin Buettner
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-03-16 19:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Kevin Buettner
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-15 20:40 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Kevin Buettner [this message]
2004-03-15 21:18 ` Kevin Buettner
2004-03-19 20:50 ` Kevin Buettner
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Kevin Buettner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040315141800.33fb721d@saguaro \
--to=kevinb@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox