From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Paul Hilfinger <hilfingr@gnat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Add language-dependent post-parser
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 22:29:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040304222942.GB29911@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20040304222900.LQLeSirkFvhGuQSHAtphd6x8d08B-678udvEGPKOqfA@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040304113345.5DADDF2EDC@nile.gnat.com>
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 06:33:45AM -0500, Paul Hilfinger wrote:
>
> For Ada, we found it convenient to do a name-resolution pass after parsing and
> before evaluation of expressions. The most convenient form on which to
> perform this resolution is the prefix form (that way, we can use the usual
> type-computing machinery already included in expression evaluation).
> Unfortunately, prefixification occurs after and separate from parsing.
> The obvious thing to do was to add a function to the language vector for
> post-parsing. For most languages, it does nothing. The patch below
> does most of the work in inserting this hook, including the introduction
> of a parse-in-type-context function that provides a type context for
> the post-parser. In its current form, this patch is a NOP that merely
> provides the hooks.
Could you explain more about why you found this necessary? It's hard
to evaluate the patch without that.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-04 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-19 0:09 Paul Hilfinger
2004-03-04 11:33 ` Paul Hilfinger
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2004-03-04 22:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-05 8:15 ` Paul Hilfinger
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Paul Hilfinger
2004-04-02 16:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-04-03 12:05 ` Paul Hilfinger
2004-04-07 9:32 ` Paul Hilfinger
2004-04-09 22:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-04-10 22:12 ` Paul Hilfinger
2004-03-30 9:24 Paul Hilfinger
2004-03-30 14:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-31 8:02 ` Paul Hilfinger
2004-03-31 15:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-31 15:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-31 16:49 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-31 16:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-04-01 10:43 ` Paul Hilfinger
2004-04-02 16:25 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040304222942.GB29911@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=hilfingr@gnat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox