Re: [PATCH] Multi-arch SKIP_SOLIB_RESOLVER

[Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>]

   Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2003 08:38:57 -0500
   From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>

   > I'm working on integrating some mostly SPARC-related patches from
   > David S. Miller.  There were also some general bits in his tree that
   > I'm going to check in on mainline.  Here's the first.

   You mean the stuff david posted here?

Some of it has been posted, some hasn't.  I explicitly asked David
about the copyright status, and he told me it was all written by
himself, and that is copyright assignment is still in place.

   > Committed as obvious (to mainline).

   It should be "m" or "M", and not "f".
   You'll also note that I've started deleting still lurking macros so 
   these conversions are no longer so obvious :-)

Hmm.  So the "f" conversions are no longer considered obvious?  The
problem with "m" and "M" is that they no longer define the macro that
we're replacing.  That means things become a bit more complicated.  Do
you want me to replace SKIP_SOLIB_RESOLVER with a truly multi-arched
function?

Mark