From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25797 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2003 17:41:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25754 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2003 17:41:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO walton.kettenis.dyndns.org) (213.93.115.144) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Nov 2003 17:41:06 -0000 Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org [192.168.0.2]) by walton.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.6) with ESMTP id hA9Hf0Hf000318; Sun, 9 Nov 2003 18:41:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.6) with ESMTP id hA9Hf0ho015587; Sun, 9 Nov 2003 18:41:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.6/Submit) id hA9Hf0cI015584; Sun, 9 Nov 2003 18:41:00 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2003 17:41:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200311091741.hA9Hf0cI015584@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> From: Mark Kettenis To: cagney@gnu.org CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3FAE4371.6010405@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Sun, 09 Nov 2003 08:38:57 -0500) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Multi-arch SKIP_SOLIB_RESOLVER References: <200311091207.hA9C7l5n064597@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <3FAE4371.6010405@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00171.txt.bz2 Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2003 08:38:57 -0500 From: Andrew Cagney > I'm working on integrating some mostly SPARC-related patches from > David S. Miller. There were also some general bits in his tree that > I'm going to check in on mainline. Here's the first. You mean the stuff david posted here? Some of it has been posted, some hasn't. I explicitly asked David about the copyright status, and he told me it was all written by himself, and that is copyright assignment is still in place. > Committed as obvious (to mainline). It should be "m" or "M", and not "f". You'll also note that I've started deleting still lurking macros so these conversions are no longer so obvious :-) Hmm. So the "f" conversions are no longer considered obvious? The problem with "m" and "M" is that they no longer define the macro that we're replacing. That means things become a bit more complicated. Do you want me to replace SKIP_SOLIB_RESOLVER with a truly multi-arched function? Mark