* [PATCH] Clear per-objfile data upon rereading a symbol file
@ 2003-10-26 21:12 Mark Kettenis
2003-10-27 16:14 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mark Kettenis @ 2003-10-26 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches; +Cc: Peter.Schauer
Peter Schrauer pointed out to me that upon re-reading a symbolf file,
we don't clear the per-objfile data pointers, whereas we clear almost
everything else in the symbol file related `struct objfile'. This
currently leaves us with dangling pointers into freed obstacks. The
attached patch fixes this.
I'll check this in on both branches in a few days unless somebody
objects, since this fixes a bug where GDB crashes. We can't have that
:-(.
Mark
Index: ChangeLog
from Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
* objfiles.h (clear_objfile_data): New prototype.
* objfiles.c (clear_objfile_data): New function.
* symfile.c (reread_symbols): Clear per-objfile data.
Index: symfile.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/symfile.c,v
retrieving revision 1.109
diff -u -p -r1.109 symfile.c
--- symfile.c 21 Sep 2003 01:26:45 -0000 1.109
+++ symfile.c 26 Oct 2003 21:05:52 -0000
@@ -1969,6 +1969,7 @@ reread_symbols (void)
memset (&objfile->msymbol_demangled_hash, 0,
sizeof (objfile->msymbol_demangled_hash));
objfile->fundamental_types = NULL;
+ clear_objfile_data (objfile);
if (objfile->sf != NULL)
{
(*objfile->sf->sym_finish) (objfile);
Index: objfiles.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/objfiles.c,v
retrieving revision 1.38
diff -u -p -r1.38 objfiles.c
--- objfiles.c 20 Oct 2003 14:38:42 -0000 1.38
+++ objfiles.c 26 Oct 2003 21:05:55 -0000
@@ -1166,6 +1166,13 @@ objfile_free_data (struct objfile *objfi
}
void
+clear_objfile_data (struct objfile *objfile)
+{
+ gdb_assert (objfile->data != NULL);
+ memset (objfile->data, 0, objfile->num_data * sizeof (void *));
+}
+
+void
set_objfile_data (struct objfile *objfile, const struct objfile_data *data,
void *value)
{
Index: objfiles.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/objfiles.h,v
retrieving revision 1.26
diff -u -p -r1.26 objfiles.h
--- objfiles.h 14 Sep 2003 02:04:44 -0000 1.26
+++ objfiles.h 26 Oct 2003 21:06:00 -0000
@@ -599,6 +599,7 @@ extern int is_in_import_list (char *, st
modules. */
extern const struct objfile_data *register_objfile_data (void);
+extern void clear_objfile_data (struct objfile *objfile);
extern void set_objfile_data (struct objfile *objfile,
const struct objfile_data *data, void *value);
extern void *objfile_data (struct objfile *objfile,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Clear per-objfile data upon rereading a symbol file
2003-10-26 21:12 [PATCH] Clear per-objfile data upon rereading a symbol file Mark Kettenis
@ 2003-10-27 16:14 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-10-27 20:57 ` Mark Kettenis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2003-10-27 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Kettenis; +Cc: gdb-patches, Peter.Schauer
Peter,
Would you have a test case?
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Clear per-objfile data upon rereading a symbol file
2003-10-27 16:14 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2003-10-27 20:57 ` Mark Kettenis
2003-10-28 16:05 ` Elena Zannoni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mark Kettenis @ 2003-10-27 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ac131313; +Cc: gdb-patches, Peter.Schauer
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 11:14:02 -0500
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Peter,
Would you have a test case?
Peter did mail me a testcase, telling me that the problem was very
difficult to reproduce. I must say I didn't try to reproduce the
problem. The code is so obviously wrong that I decided to fix it even
if I can't reproduce the problem.
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Clear per-objfile data upon rereading a symbol file
2003-10-27 20:57 ` Mark Kettenis
@ 2003-10-28 16:05 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-10-29 18:43 ` Mark Kettenis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Elena Zannoni @ 2003-10-28 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Kettenis; +Cc: ac131313, gdb-patches, Peter.Schauer
Mark Kettenis writes:
> Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 11:14:02 -0500
> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
>
> Peter,
>
> Would you have a test case?
>
> Peter did mail me a testcase, telling me that the problem was very
> difficult to reproduce. I must say I didn't try to reproduce the
> problem. The code is so obviously wrong that I decided to fix it even
> if I can't reproduce the problem.
>
> Mark
This is fine with me.
elena
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Clear per-objfile data upon rereading a symbol file
2003-10-28 16:05 ` Elena Zannoni
@ 2003-10-29 18:43 ` Mark Kettenis
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mark Kettenis @ 2003-10-29 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ezannoni; +Cc: ac131313, gdb-patches, Peter.Schauer
From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 11:05:55 -0500
This is fine with me.
Thanks!
Checked in on mainline and the gdb_6_0-branch.
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-10-29 18:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-10-26 21:12 [PATCH] Clear per-objfile data upon rereading a symbol file Mark Kettenis
2003-10-27 16:14 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-10-27 20:57 ` Mark Kettenis
2003-10-28 16:05 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-10-29 18:43 ` Mark Kettenis
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox