* [commit/RFC/multiarch/hpux] HPUX_ELF osabi init routine incorrectly registered
@ 2003-08-14 0:32 Joel Brobecker
2003-08-14 2:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Joel Brobecker @ 2003-08-14 0:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1291 bytes --]
Hello,
I noticed while working on the hppa64 target that the HPUX_ELF gdbarch
initialization routine was not called during the gdbarch initialization.
It turns out that we where using the default bfd arch_info descriptor
which corresponds to a 32bit ABI. So when we checked the compatibility
between the arch_info that we registered and the arch_info determined by
the sniffer, we determined that they do not match, and therefore did not
call the assiocated initialization routine.
I fixed the problem the best way I can, by using a hard-coded number
corresponding to the arch_info that corresponds to hppa2.0w. I don't
know BFD too well yet, but it looks like we should really be defining
new #defines in archures.c for each hppa machine numbers, and then use
them here instead of my hard-coded value. I added a FIXME to remind us,
and will send a patch to binutils shortly. In them meantime, this fixes
the problem.
Any opinions, maybe?
2003-08-13 J. Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
* hppa-hpux-tdep.c (_initialize_hppa_hpux_tdep): Use the correct
bfd arch_info when registering the GDB_OSABI_HPUX_ELF initialization
routine.
Tested on hppa64-hpux11.
(I have some other no-brainer patches coming, but I keep being interrupted
by other tasks :-().
--
Joel
[-- Attachment #2: osabi.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 857 bytes --]
Index: hppa-hpux-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/hppa-hpux-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -p -r1.8 hppa-hpux-tdep.c
--- hppa-hpux-tdep.c 27 Jul 2003 17:27:17 -0000 1.8
+++ hppa-hpux-tdep.c 14 Aug 2003 00:19:24 -0000
@@ -118,6 +118,9 @@ _initialize_hppa_hpux_tdep (void)
{
gdbarch_register_osabi (bfd_arch_hppa, 0, GDB_OSABI_HPUX_SOM,
hppa_hpux_som_init_abi);
- gdbarch_register_osabi (bfd_arch_hppa, 0, GDB_OSABI_HPUX_ELF,
+ /* FIXME brobecker 2003-08-13: The machine number 25 corresponds to
+ the hppa2.0w bfd arch_info. A #define should probably be defined
+ in bfd, instead of using this hard-coded number. */
+ gdbarch_register_osabi (bfd_arch_hppa, 25, GDB_OSABI_HPUX_ELF,
hppa_hpux_elf_init_abi);
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [commit/RFC/multiarch/hpux] HPUX_ELF osabi init routine incorrectly registered
2003-08-14 0:32 [commit/RFC/multiarch/hpux] HPUX_ELF osabi init routine incorrectly registered Joel Brobecker
@ 2003-08-14 2:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2003-08-14 2:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 05:32:22PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed while working on the hppa64 target that the HPUX_ELF gdbarch
> initialization routine was not called during the gdbarch initialization.
> It turns out that we where using the default bfd arch_info descriptor
> which corresponds to a 32bit ABI. So when we checked the compatibility
> between the arch_info that we registered and the arch_info determined by
> the sniffer, we determined that they do not match, and therefore did not
> call the assiocated initialization routine.
>
> I fixed the problem the best way I can, by using a hard-coded number
> corresponding to the arch_info that corresponds to hppa2.0w. I don't
> know BFD too well yet, but it looks like we should really be defining
> new #defines in archures.c for each hppa machine numbers, and then use
> them here instead of my hard-coded value. I added a FIXME to remind us,
> and will send a patch to binutils shortly. In them meantime, this fixes
> the problem.
>
> Any opinions, maybe?
Seems right to me, on all counts. But would you mind sending the BFD
patch first and then using the machine #define in GDB? It's just a
matter of adding the define and regenerating bfd-in2.h.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-08-14 2:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-08-14 0:32 [commit/RFC/multiarch/hpux] HPUX_ELF osabi init routine incorrectly registered Joel Brobecker
2003-08-14 2:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox