From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: GDB <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
Cc: jimb@redhat.com, ezannoni@redhat.com
Subject: Re: PATCH: Fix DW_OP_deref for DW_TAG_formal_parameter
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:51:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030731165133.GA16435@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030731162207.GA24040@nevyn.them.org>
Hi Elena, hi Jim,
Since this patch fixes HJ's problem, I'm submitting it for approval.
It cuts out another user of decode_locdesc. Why Fortran has arguments
passed by DW_OP_deref is something I don't really want to think
about... one of many things I don't like about Fortran :)
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 12:22:07PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 09:12:59AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 11:48:21AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 08:44:05AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 08:27:53PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 05:23:06PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 05:56:12PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 02:54:21PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > > > > > > > Does DW_OP_deref work correctly with gdb?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > That depends on the context. Things that use decode_locdesc, probably
> > > > > > > not. As we find time, things are being converted to the full
> > > > > > > expression evaluator. Location descriptions and frame bases should
> > > > > > > work.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't think it does. Intel Fortran compiler generartes DW_OP_deref.
> > > > > > I got
> > > > >
> > > > > Location descriptions for parameters may not work fully. Feel free to
> > > > > fix it, or to investigate the reasons why more thoroughly - search for
> > > > > LOC_COMPUTED_ARG, but I don't even think we generate those yet.
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> > > Please look more closely at what I suggested, and at how DW_OP_deref
> > > works for DW_TAG_variable (as opposed to DW_TAG_formal_parameter). All
> > > of the above should be turned into LOC_COMPUTED_ARG.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks. This patch works for me.
>
> Could you test this alternative? The goal is to eliminate calls to
> decode_locdesc.
> 2003-07-31 Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
>
> * dwarf2read.c (new_symbol): Use var_decode_location for parameters.
>
> Index: dwarf2read.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/dwarf2read.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.98
> diff -u -p -r1.98 dwarf2read.c
> --- dwarf2read.c 22 Jul 2003 15:41:59 -0000 1.98
> +++ dwarf2read.c 31 Jul 2003 16:21:04 -0000
> @@ -5207,32 +5207,10 @@ new_symbol (struct die_info *die, struct
> attr = dwarf_attr (die, DW_AT_location);
> if (attr)
> {
> - SYMBOL_VALUE (sym) =
> - decode_locdesc (DW_BLOCK (attr), objfile, cu_header);
> - if (isreg)
> - {
> - SYMBOL_CLASS (sym) = LOC_REGPARM;
> - SYMBOL_VALUE (sym) =
> - DWARF2_REG_TO_REGNUM (SYMBOL_VALUE (sym));
> - }
> - else if (offreg)
> - {
> - if (isderef)
> - {
> - if (basereg != frame_base_reg)
> - dwarf2_complex_location_expr_complaint ();
> - SYMBOL_CLASS (sym) = LOC_REF_ARG;
> - }
> - else
> - {
> - SYMBOL_CLASS (sym) = LOC_BASEREG_ARG;
> - SYMBOL_BASEREG (sym) = DWARF2_REG_TO_REGNUM (basereg);
> - }
> - }
> - else
> - {
> - SYMBOL_CLASS (sym) = LOC_ARG;
> - }
> + var_decode_location (attr, sym, objfile, cu_header);
> + /* FIXME drow/2003-07-31: Is LOC_COMPUTED_ARG necessary? */
> + if (SYMBOL_CLASS (sym) == LOC_COMPUTED)
> + SYMBOL_CLASS (sym) = LOC_COMPUTED_ARG;
> }
> attr = dwarf_attr (die, DW_AT_const_value);
> if (attr)
>
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-31 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20030730215421.GA26408@lucon.org>
[not found] ` <20030730215612.GB15640@nevyn.them.org>
[not found] ` <20030731002306.GA28960@lucon.org>
[not found] ` <20030731002753.GA18866@nevyn.them.org>
[not found] ` <20030731154405.GA11592@lucon.org>
[not found] ` <20030731154821.GA10106@nevyn.them.org>
2003-07-31 16:13 ` H. J. Lu
2003-07-31 16:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-07-31 16:39 ` H. J. Lu
2003-07-31 16:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-07-31 20:12 ` Jim Blandy
2003-07-31 21:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030731165133.GA16435@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=ezannoni@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jimb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox