* Re: Fix float/double return on x86-64
[not found] <3F0E91CD.1000808@suse.cz>
@ 2003-07-11 12:35 ` Mark Kettenis
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mark Kettenis @ 2003-07-11 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mludvig; +Cc: aj, gdb-patches
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 12:30:37 +0200
From: Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz>
Andreas Jaeger told me that:
>
> The appended patch fixes these three failures on x86-64:
> FAIL: gdb.base/return.exp: correct value returned double test (known problem with sparc solaris)
> FAIL: gdb.base/return2.exp: float value returned successfully
> FAIL: gdb.base/return2.exp: double value returned successfully
>
> The code does not handle complex floating point values, I'm not sure
> that it's correct there but I decided to fix this issue first.
>
> Ok to commit for both branches?
Mark, could you comment on this one, please? Could it go in?
Sorry, yes, I thought I already approved that one. Turns out it
slipped through the cracks after all. Please go ahead and check it in
on both branches.
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Fix float/double return on x86-64
@ 2003-06-26 5:46 Andreas Jaeger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Jaeger @ 2003-06-26 5:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
The appended patch fixes these three failures on x86-64:
FAIL: gdb.base/return.exp: correct value returned double test (known problem with sparc solaris)
FAIL: gdb.base/return2.exp: float value returned successfully
FAIL: gdb.base/return2.exp: double value returned successfully
The code does not handle complex floating point values, I'm not sure
that it's correct there but I decided to fix this issue first.
Ok to commit for both branches?
Andreas
2003-06-25 Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
* x86-64-tdep.c (x86_64_store_return_value): Return double and
float values in SSE register.
============================================================
Index: src/gdb/x86-64-tdep.c
--- src/gdb/x86-64-tdep.c 15 Jun 2003 11:01:46 -0000 1.79
+++ src/gdb/x86-64-tdep.c 25 Jun 2003 19:10:46 -0000
@@ -712,8 +727,9 @@ x86_64_store_return_value (struct type *
{
int len = TYPE_LENGTH (type);
- if (TYPE_CODE_FLT == TYPE_CODE (type))
- {
+ /* First handle long doubles. */
+ if (TYPE_CODE_FLT == TYPE_CODE (type) && len == 16)
+ {
ULONGEST fstat;
char buf[FPU_REG_RAW_SIZE];
@@ -741,6 +757,12 @@ x86_64_store_return_value (struct type *
for the tag word is 0x3fff. */
regcache_raw_write_unsigned (regcache, FTAG_REGNUM, 0x3fff);
}
+ else if (TYPE_CODE_FLT == TYPE_CODE (type))
+ {
+ /* Handle double and float variables. */
+ regcache_cooked_write (regcache, X86_64_XMM0_REGNUM, valbuf);
+ }
+ /* XXX: What about complex floating point types? */
else
{
int low_size = REGISTER_RAW_SIZE (0);
--
Andreas Jaeger, SuSE Linux AG, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-07-11 12:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <3F0E91CD.1000808@suse.cz>
2003-07-11 12:35 ` Fix float/double return on x86-64 Mark Kettenis
2003-06-26 5:46 Andreas Jaeger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox