From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>
Cc: mludvig@suse.cz, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Re: Analyzing AMD64 corefiles on i386
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 18:08:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030709180801.GA23865@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200307091338.h69Dc8u7023807@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org>
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 03:38:08PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 13:03:06 +0200
> From: Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz>
>
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --------------050406070409000508090803
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Mark Kettenis told me that:
> > Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 14:43:49 +0200
> > From: Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz>
> >
> > Hi,
> > what must be done to enable reading of AMD64 corefiles in a gdb running
> > on i386 with --target=amd64?
> >
> > The necessary support for corefiles needs to be added to
> > x86-64-linux-tdep.c. Take a look at i386nbsd-tdep.c for an example.
> > You'll need to create a `struct core_fns' together with the necessary
> > support functions, and register it with add_core_fns. Note that for
> > the support functions you can't rely on definitions in header files
> > and such since this is target code. You'll also need to drop
> > core-regset.o from NATDEPFILES in x86-64-linux.mh.
>
> How about the attached one? Works for me on cross-gdb i386->amd64 as
> well as in native amd64 gdb. Can I apply it?
>
> Not as such. We can't allow public functions with the names
> supply_gregset and fill_gregset in *-tdep.c files. Therefore these
> functions should be renamed, and supply_gregset and fill_gregset
> should be kept in your *-nat.c file. You'll probably want to rewrite
> those functions such that they call the new functions in *-tdep.c.
I don't see the harm. They need to be multi-arched instead of called
by name, eventually, but it's no extra work to rename them at that
time.
But that's just my personal opinion.
> Personally I wouldn't define all those constants if the only place
> where they'll be used is the regmap array, but that's a matter of
> taste.
I'm guessing it makes it easier to at-a-glance compare with
<sys/reg.h>. I did the same thing.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-09 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3F0ABC85.1080700@suse.cz>
[not found] ` <200307081445.h68EjBWJ000503@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org>
2003-07-09 11:03 ` Michal Ludvig
2003-07-09 11:56 ` Andreas Schwab
2003-07-09 13:40 ` Mark Kettenis
2003-07-09 13:38 ` Mark Kettenis
2003-07-09 18:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-07-09 19:52 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-07-09 21:46 ` Mark Kettenis
2003-07-10 10:05 ` Michal Ludvig
2003-07-14 19:26 ` Mark Kettenis
2003-07-15 11:34 ` Michal Ludvig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030709180801.GA23865@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=kettenis@chello.nl \
--cc=mludvig@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox