Re: [RFA/ARM] Framificate the ARM port [3/3]

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>]

On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 02:27:07PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >Index: gdb/varobj.c
> >===================================================================
> >--- gdb.orig/varobj.c	2003-06-30 18:28:07.000000000 -0400
> >+++ gdb/varobj.c	2003-06-30 18:28:57.000000000 -0400
> >@@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ find_frame_addr_in_frame_chain (CORE_ADD
> >       frame = get_prev_frame (frame);
> >       if (frame == NULL)
> > 	return NULL;
> >-      if (get_frame_base (frame) == frame_addr)
> >+      if (get_frame_base_address (frame) == frame_addr)
> > 	return frame;
> >     }
> 
> Just in case you're wondering.
> 
> This would break any architecture that didn't have an FP called "fp". 
> This is because, "$fp" defaults to get_frame_base() ... :-(

Argh!

get_frame_base_address defaults to get_frame_base; I could update
value_of_builtin_frame_fp_reg safely, I think.  But I have no idea
where that would end up, so I'm going to defer to your judgement on
this if you've got a preference...

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer