Re: [toplevel patch] Remove bogus conditional

[Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>]

>> Nobody noticed. :-)
>
>Unfortunately, that doesn't mean a lot.
>
>> Tested on i686-pc-linux-gnu.
>
>Could you test the case this is designed for, i.e., cross-building a
>native?

Here's the curious thing.  The case this is designed for was unchanged 
by the typo.  (The case where host_canonical != build_canonical.  With 
the typo, host_canon*ci*al != build_canonical, so it still executes.) 

The case which was changed by the typo is the case where 
host_canonical=build_canonical (but due to the typo, host_canon*ci*al != 
build_canonical). 

In other words, the native and ordinary cross cases.  Which I'm guessing 
are sufficiently tested, and which is why I'm surprised that nobody 
noticed.

At the moment, I can't test a cross-built native properly 'cause I can't 
find any which ever worked quite right for me.  :-(  But that's the 
case where I never changed anything here!

--Nathanael