Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] i386-tdep.c: Remove call to inside_entry_file
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 13:19:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030410131924.GA16613@cygbert.vinschen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86u1db8tu8.fsf@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org>

On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 06:38:07PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Therefore, I think it's best to apply your alternative patch.  Your
> second version is herewith approved.

Thanks.  I've applied a changed version which additionally defines
a new frame_chain_valid function for Cygwin.  This exactly eliminates
all FAILs in gdb.asm/asm-source.exp.

Corinna


2003-04-10  Corinna Vinschen  <vinschen@redhat.com>

        * i386-cygwin-tdep.c (i386_cygwin_frame_chain): New function.
        (i386_cygwin_init_abi): Set i386_cygwin_frame_chain as new
        frame_chain function.
        * Makefile.in: Add dependencies due to above change.

Index: Makefile.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/Makefile.in,v
retrieving revision 1.360
retrieving revision 1.361
diff -p -u -r1.360 -r1.361
--- Makefile.in	6 Apr 2003 01:13:58 -0000	1.360
+++ Makefile.in	10 Apr 2003 13:15:50 -0000	1.361
@@ -1798,7 +1798,7 @@ i386gnu-tdep.o: i386gnu-tdep.c $(defs_h)
 i386ly-tdep.o: i386ly-tdep.c $(defs_h) $(gdbcore_h) $(inferior_h) \
 	$(regcache_h) $(target_h) $(i386_tdep_h) $(osabi_h)
 i386-cygwin-tdep.o: i386-cygwin-tdep.c $(defs_h) $(gdb_string_h) \
-	$(i386_tdep_h) $(osabi_h)
+	$(i386_tdep_h) $(osabi_h) $(gdbcore_h) $(frame_h) $(dummy_frame_h)
 i386nbsd-tdep.o: i386nbsd-tdep.c $(defs_h) $(gdbtypes_h) $(gdbcore_h) \
 	$(regcache_h) $(arch_utils_h) $(i386_tdep_h) $(i387_tdep_h) \
 	$(nbsd_tdep_h) $(solib_svr4_h) $(osabi_h)
Index: i386-cygwin-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/i386-cygwin-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -p -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- i386-cygwin-tdep.c	21 Mar 2003 10:07:17 -0000	1.1
+++ i386-cygwin-tdep.c	10 Apr 2003 13:15:50 -0000	1.2
@@ -20,8 +20,37 @@ Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suit
 #include "defs.h"
 
 #include "gdb_string.h"
+#include "gdbcore.h"
 #include "i386-tdep.h"
 #include "osabi.h"
+#include "frame.h"
+#include "dummy-frame.h"
+
+static int
+i386_cygwin_frame_chain_valid (CORE_ADDR chain, struct frame_info *thisframe)
+{
+  /* In the context where this is used, we get the saved PC before we've
+     successfully unwound far enough to be sure what we've got (it may
+     be a signal handler caller).  If we're dealing with a signal
+     handler caller, this will return valid, which is fine.  If not,
+     it'll make the correct test.  */
+  return ((get_frame_type (thisframe) == SIGTRAMP_FRAME) || chain != 0);
+}
+/* Return the chain-pointer for FRAME.  In the case of the i386, the
+   frame's nominal address is the address of a 4-byte word containing
+   the calling frame's address.  */
+static CORE_ADDR
+i386_cygwin_frame_chain (struct frame_info *frame)
+{
+  if (pc_in_dummy_frame (get_frame_pc (frame)))
+    return get_frame_base (frame);
+
+  if (get_frame_type (frame) == SIGTRAMP_FRAME
+      || i386_frameless_signal_p (frame))
+    return get_frame_base (frame);
+
+  return read_memory_unsigned_integer (get_frame_base (frame), 4);
+}
 
 static void
 i386_cygwin_init_abi (struct gdbarch_info info, struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
@@ -29,6 +58,8 @@ i386_cygwin_init_abi (struct gdbarch_inf
   struct gdbarch_tdep *tdep = gdbarch_tdep (gdbarch);
 
   tdep->struct_return = reg_struct_return;
+  set_gdbarch_deprecated_frame_chain (gdbarch, i386_cygwin_frame_chain);
+  set_gdbarch_deprecated_frame_chain_valid (gdbarch, i386_cygwin_frame_chain_valid);
 }
 
 static enum gdb_osabi


-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Developer
Red Hat, Inc.
mailto:vinschen@redhat.com


      reply	other threads:[~2003-04-10 13:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-01 15:44 Corinna Vinschen
2003-04-01 15:57 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-01 16:21   ` Corinna Vinschen
2003-04-06 16:38 ` Mark Kettenis
2003-04-10 13:19   ` Corinna Vinschen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030410131924.GA16613@cygbert.vinschen.de \
    --to=vinschen@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox