Re: PING: [RFA] Runtime Dwarf2 CFI engine cleanup

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>]

On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 02:34:19PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >>Puzzled expression.
> >
> >
> >This is the problem with vague lines of authority.  It's not always
> >clear who can approve a patch even to people who do the approving.  I'm
> >tired of exercising what seems to be pretty clear authority to approve
> >something and getting prickly mail from someone else overturning my
> >decision.
> 
> The file is dwarf2*, when originally approved, it was done by a dwarf2 
> maintainer.  I'm sorry but, at least here, I'm really struggling to see 
> how, this can be somehow vague or ill defined.

The file is only tangentially related to symbol reading, and was first
approved by a global maintainer.  I'm really struggling to see how this
is vague or ill defined.

[On the other hand, it's definitely very close to the dwarf2 reader;
but those parts are not affected by this patch.  I am merely trying to
make my point.]

In any case I am withdrawing my attempt to be helpful, since obviously
I'm being pushy again instead of helpful.  Michal can go back to
waiting for someone else's response since my "help" has obviously
injured the entire process.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer