From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] convert blocks to dictionaries, phase 1, main part
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 07:35:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020917143553.GA28408@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ro1fzw9h8r2.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 03:25:53PM -0700, David Carlton wrote:
> This is the first of three patches that will begin the process of
> converting blocks to do variable lookup via dictionaries. (Which are
> what I'd been calling environments until Andrew noted that that
> clashed with the existing 'struct environ'.)
>
> The goal of these three patches it to make sure that all blocks that
> are created have a 'dict' member. Once these patches are applied, it
> will be possible to lookup variables either using the old methods
> (BLOCK_SYM, etc.) or using the new dictionary methods. Phase 2 will
> then convert all accessors over to using th new dictionary methods;
> phase 3 will get rid of the old methods so that the new dictionary
> methods get used exclusively.
David,
I've only skimmed this, but it looks nice. I think that you should
take Andrew's suggestion, though - create a branch to finish this work
on. It's a bit of a hassle, since you'll need to do periodic merges to
the branch, but I don't feel right adding something with this many
temporary interfaces and FIXMEs to the trunk. Then you can commit
patches on the branch without approval, and get it into a stabler
state.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-17 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-16 15:26 David Carlton
2002-09-16 15:30 ` David Carlton
2002-09-17 7:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2002-09-17 9:03 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-17 10:43 ` David Carlton
2002-09-17 10:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-17 11:34 ` David Carlton
2002-09-17 12:24 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-17 11:44 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-17 12:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-17 12:49 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-17 13:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-17 21:48 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-09-18 7:26 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-20 9:13 ` Jim Blandy
2002-09-17 12:59 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-09-17 13:13 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-17 9:29 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-17 11:04 ` David Carlton
2002-09-17 12:16 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-17 12:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-17 12:46 ` David Carlton
2002-09-17 12:57 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-22 14:51 ` Jim Blandy
2002-09-17 12:54 ` Michael Snyder
2002-09-17 12:59 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-09-18 2:56 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-09-18 14:07 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-19 3:14 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-09-19 6:18 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-09-19 7:52 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-09-19 7:51 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-22 14:41 ` Jim Blandy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020917143553.GA28408@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox