From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
Cc: David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>,
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] convert blocks to dictionaries, phase 1, main part
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 12:59:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <019B4A01-CA78-11D6-9548-000393575BCC@dberlin.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D877FA4.8050607@ges.redhat.com>
On Tuesday, September 17, 2002, at 03:16 PM, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
>>> - macro's are bad m'kay :-)
>> Even accessor macros for members of structures? Gee, I like those:
>> it's a lot easier to find all places where, say, struct block's
>> 'hashtable' member is being used by grepping for 'BLOCK_HASHTABLE'
>> than by grepping for 'hashtable' and then sorting out which ones of
>> those really are referring to the 'hashtable' member as opposed to
>> some other use of the phrase.
>
> Yep. If you think accessor macro's are a good idea, try debugging /
> using sim/common some time :-(
macro expansion is now supported, remember.
:)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-17 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-16 15:26 David Carlton
2002-09-16 15:30 ` David Carlton
2002-09-17 7:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-17 9:03 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-17 10:43 ` David Carlton
2002-09-17 10:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-17 11:34 ` David Carlton
2002-09-17 12:24 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-17 11:44 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-17 12:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-17 12:49 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-17 13:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-17 21:48 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-09-18 7:26 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-20 9:13 ` Jim Blandy
2002-09-17 12:59 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-09-17 13:13 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-17 9:29 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-17 11:04 ` David Carlton
2002-09-17 12:16 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-17 12:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-17 12:46 ` David Carlton
2002-09-17 12:57 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-22 14:51 ` Jim Blandy
2002-09-17 12:54 ` Michael Snyder
2002-09-17 12:59 ` Daniel Berlin [this message]
2002-09-18 2:56 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-09-18 14:07 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-19 3:14 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-09-19 6:18 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-09-19 7:52 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-09-19 7:51 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-22 14:41 ` Jim Blandy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=019B4A01-CA78-11D6-9548-000393575BCC@dberlin.org \
--to=dberlin@dberlin.org \
--cc=ac131313@ges.redhat.com \
--cc=carlton@math.stanford.edu \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox