Re: RFA/remote: Clean up remote_open_1 and friend

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>]

On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 11:26:07AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >I was looking at some future changes to remote_open_1, and didn't want to
> >duplicate them in remote_async_open_1, so I folded the two functions
> >together.  The changes were pretty small, and I think reasonable.  Andrew,
> >any thoughts?  This will let me kill the wrapper functions in a later 
> >patch,
> >I think.  I'm considering adding local state to the target stack right
> >now... which will make autodetecting which remote protocol to use even
> >simpler and cleaner.
> 
> Yes!
> 
> >+  remote_open_1 (name, from_tty, &extended_remote_ops, 1 /*extended_p */, 
> >0);
> 
> Can you just add a parameter name comment so it reads ``0 /* async_p */''.

Committed with that tweak.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer