From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Don't include vector registers in ``info registers''
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 18:33:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020809013343.GA5331@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D53041D.90609@ges.redhat.com>
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 07:51:57PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The attached patch modifies the generic ``info registsters'' command so
> that it precludes vector registers (in addition to floating-point
> registers). The online doco indicates:
>
> (gdb) help info registers
> List of integer registers and their contents, for selected stack frame.
> Register name as argument means describe only that register.
> (gdb) help info all-registers
> List of all registers and their contents, for selected stack frame.
> Register name as argument means describe only that register.
>
> I think the change makes the behavour a better match for both the
> documentation and what I think is the intent of the command. Print a
> minimal set of registers.
>
> It will eventually affect the i386 -- I've a patch to change the type of
> xmm [and mmx] registers to true vectors. When that is in, ``info
> registers'' will stop displaying the xmm registers.
>
> Thoughts?
My only comment is that I would also like ``info registers'' not to
print kernel-mode or processor status registers, since that seems (to
me) to be appropriate; it should print registers for stack/pc and
computation primarily, not things like the MSR.
Might be harder to do generically though.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-09 1:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-08 16:52 Andrew Cagney
2002-08-08 17:07 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-08 19:07 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-08-08 19:24 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-13 14:45 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-09 11:39 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-15 17:12 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-08 18:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2002-08-08 18:45 ` Michael Snyder
2002-08-08 19:35 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-08 18:50 ` Michael Snyder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020809013343.GA5331@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=ac131313@ges.redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox