Re: Which autoheader?

[Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 370 bytes --]

> Sounds like a very good idea.

I am ready to check in the following patch. It is pretty obvious, but
I want to make sure there is nothing else that might be worthwhile
adding.

2002-07-09  Joel Brobecker  <brobecker@gnat.com>

        * gdb.texinfo (Create a release candiate): Add the location
        where the proper version of autoconf can be retrieved.

-- 
Joel

[-- Attachment #2: gdbint.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1007 bytes --]

Index: gdbint.texinfo
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.93
diff -c -r1.93 gdbint.texinfo
*** gdbint.texinfo	27 Jun 2002 15:30:32 -0000	1.93
--- gdbint.texinfo	9 Jul 2002 23:12:49 -0000
***************
*** 5754,5760 ****
  @itemize @bullet
  @item
  Check the @code{autoconf} version carefully.  You want to be using the
! version taken from the @file{binutils} snapshot directory.  It is very
  unlikely that a system installed version of @code{autoconf} (e.g.,
  @file{/usr/bin/autoconf}) is correct.
  @end itemize
--- 5754,5761 ----
  @itemize @bullet
  @item
  Check the @code{autoconf} version carefully.  You want to be using the
! version taken from the @file{binutils} snapshot directory, which can be
! found at @uref{ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/binutils/}. It is very
  unlikely that a system installed version of @code{autoconf} (e.g.,
  @file{/usr/bin/autoconf}) is correct.
  @end itemize