From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31922 invoked by alias); 9 Jul 2002 23:16:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31914 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2002 23:16:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Jul 2002 23:16:47 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 86B68D2CBD; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 16:16:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 21:58:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Which autoheader? Message-ID: <20020709231647.GH2538@gnat.com> References: <3D2A658A.1060100@ges.redhat.com> <87ptxxfpsh.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <3D2AEFE7.2090605@ges.redhat.com> <20020709154658.GB2538@gnat.com> <3D2B50E4.7000100@ges.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D2B50E4.7000100@ges.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00173.txt.bz2 --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-length: 370 > Sounds like a very good idea. I am ready to check in the following patch. It is pretty obvious, but I want to make sure there is nothing else that might be worthwhile adding. 2002-07-09 Joel Brobecker * gdb.texinfo (Create a release candiate): Add the location where the proper version of autoconf can be retrieved. -- Joel --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="gdbint.diff" Content-length: 1007 Index: gdbint.texinfo =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo,v retrieving revision 1.93 diff -c -r1.93 gdbint.texinfo *** gdbint.texinfo 27 Jun 2002 15:30:32 -0000 1.93 --- gdbint.texinfo 9 Jul 2002 23:12:49 -0000 *************** *** 5754,5760 **** @itemize @bullet @item Check the @code{autoconf} version carefully. You want to be using the ! version taken from the @file{binutils} snapshot directory. It is very unlikely that a system installed version of @code{autoconf} (e.g., @file{/usr/bin/autoconf}) is correct. @end itemize --- 5754,5761 ---- @itemize @bullet @item Check the @code{autoconf} version carefully. You want to be using the ! version taken from the @file{binutils} snapshot directory, which can be ! found at @uref{ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/binutils/}. It is very unlikely that a system installed version of @code{autoconf} (e.g., @file{/usr/bin/autoconf}) is correct. @end itemize --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI--