* [patch] remove references to librx from top level
@ 2002-06-19 10:15 Nathanael Nerode
2002-06-19 10:42 ` DJ Delorie
2002-06-19 16:07 ` DJ Delorie
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nathanael Nerode @ 2002-06-19 10:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches; +Cc: gdb-patches, binutils, dj
Librx isn't in src or gcc; it hasn't been updated since 1998. I doubt
it would build in this tree, and it shouldn't be anyway.
2002-06-19 Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>
* configure.in: Remove references to librx.
* Makefile.in: Remove references to librx.
Index: configure.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/gcc/gcc/configure.in,v
retrieving revision 1.154
diff -u -3 -r1.154 configure.in
--- configure.in 18 Jun 2002 21:58:44 -0000 1.154
+++ configure.in 19 Jun 2002 17:09:22 -0000
@@ -66,7 +66,6 @@
target_libs="target-libiberty \
target-libgloss \
target-newlib \
- target-librx \
${libstdcxx_version} \
target-libf2c \
${libgcj}
@@ -639,7 +638,7 @@
esac
;;
*-*-netware)
- noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs ${libstdcxx_version} target-librx target-newlib target-libiberty target-libgloss ${libgcj}"
+ noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs ${libstdcxx_version} target-newlib target-libiberty target-libgloss ${libgcj}"
;;
*-*-rtems*)
noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs target-libgloss ${libgcj}"
@@ -665,8 +664,6 @@
alpha*-*-linux*)
# newlib is not 64 bit ready
noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs target-newlib target-libgloss"
- # linux has rx in libc
- skipdirs="$skipdirs target-librx"
;;
alpha*-*-freebsd*)
noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs target-newlib target-libgloss"
@@ -677,8 +674,6 @@
;;
sh-*-linux*)
noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs ${libgcj} target-newlib target-libgloss"
- # linux has rx in libc
- skipdirs="$skipdirs target-librx"
;;
sh*-*-pe|mips*-*-pe|*arm-wince-pe)
noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs ${libgcj}"
@@ -735,7 +730,7 @@
noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs target-libiberty ${libstdcxx_version} ${libgcj}"
;;
c4x-*-*)
- noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs ${libstdcxx_version} target-librx target-libgloss ${libgcj}"
+ noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs ${libstdcxx_version} target-libgloss ${libgcj}"
;;
c54x*-*-* | tic54x-*-*)
noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs ${libstdcxx_version} target-libgloss ${libgcj} gcc gdb newlib"
@@ -744,7 +739,7 @@
noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs ${libgcj}"
;;
d10v-*-*)
- noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs target-librx ${libstdcxx_version} target-libgloss ${libgcj}"
+ noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs ${libstdcxx_version} target-libgloss ${libgcj}"
;;
d30v-*-*)
noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs ${libgcj}"
@@ -765,7 +760,7 @@
noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs target-libgloss"
;;
h8500-*-*)
- noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs ${libstdcxx_version} target-librx target-libgloss ${libgcj} target-libf2c"
+ noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs ${libstdcxx_version} target-libgloss ${libgcj} target-libf2c"
;;
hppa*64*-*-linux* | parisc*64*-*-linux*)
# In this case, it's because the hppa64-linux target is for
@@ -805,8 +800,6 @@
s390*-*-linux*)
# The libffi port is not yet in the GCC tree
noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs target-newlib target-libgloss ${libgcj}"
- # linux has rx in libc
- skipdirs="$skipdirs target-librx"
;;
i[3456]86-*-linux*)
# This section makes it possible to build newlib natively on linux.
@@ -819,13 +812,9 @@
# Note however, that newlib will only be configured in this situation
# if the --with-newlib option has been given, because otherwise
# 'target-newlib' will appear in skipdirs.
- # linux has rx in libc
- skipdirs="$skipdirs target-librx"
;;
*-*-linux*)
noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs target-newlib target-libgloss"
- # linux has rx in libc
- skipdirs="$skipdirs target-librx"
;;
i[3456]86-*-mingw32*)
target_configdirs="$target_configdirs target-mingw"
@@ -852,7 +841,7 @@
esac
;;
i[3456]86-*-pe)
- noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs ${libstdcxx_version} target-librx target-libgloss ${libgcj}"
+ noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs ${libstdcxx_version} target-libgloss ${libgcj}"
;;
i[3456]86-*-sco3.2v5*)
# The linker does not yet know about weak symbols in COFF,
Index: Makefile.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/gcc/gcc/Makefile.in,v
retrieving revision 1.103
diff -u -3 -r1.103 Makefile.in
--- Makefile.in 11 Jun 2002 23:53:11 -0000 1.103
+++ Makefile.in 19 Jun 2002 17:09:34 -0000
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@
# This is set by the configure script to the list of directories which
# should be built using the target tools.
-TARGET_CONFIGDIRS = libiberty libgloss $(SPECIAL_LIBS) newlib librx winsup opcodes bsp libstub cygmon libf2c libobjc
+TARGET_CONFIGDIRS = libiberty libgloss $(SPECIAL_LIBS) newlib winsup opcodes bsp libstub cygmon libf2c libobjc
# Target libraries are put under this directory:
# Changed by configure to $(target_alias) if cross.
@@ -783,7 +783,6 @@
# using $(TARGET_FLAGS_TO_PASS).
ALL_TARGET_MODULES = \
all-target-libstdc++-v3 \
- all-target-librx \
all-target-newlib \
all-target-libf2c \
all-target-libobjc \
@@ -806,7 +805,6 @@
# are compiled using the target tools.
CONFIGURE_TARGET_MODULES = \
configure-target-libstdc++-v3 \
- configure-target-librx \
configure-target-newlib \
configure-target-libf2c \
configure-target-libobjc \
@@ -932,7 +930,6 @@
# All of the target modules that can be cleaned
CLEAN_TARGET_MODULES = \
clean-target-libstdc++-v3 \
- clean-target-librx \
clean-target-newlib \
clean-target-libf2c \
clean-target-libobjc \
@@ -1747,7 +1744,7 @@
all-gprof: all-libiberty all-bfd all-opcodes all-intl
all-grep: all-libiberty
all-grez: all-libiberty all-bfd all-opcodes
-all-gui: all-gdb all-libproc all-target-librx
+all-gui: all-gdb all-libproc
all-guile:
all-gzip: all-libiberty
all-hello: all-libiberty
@@ -1768,8 +1765,6 @@
all-target-libffi: configure-target-libffi
configure-target-libjava: $(ALL_GCC_C) configure-target-zlib configure-target-boehm-gc configure-target-qthreads configure-target-libffi
all-target-libjava: configure-target-libjava all-fastjar all-target-zlib all-target-boehm-gc all-target-qthreads all-target-libffi
-configure-target-librx: $(ALL_GCC_C)
-all-target-librx: configure-target-librx
configure-target-libstdc++-v3: $(ALL_GCC_C)
all-target-libstdc++-v3: configure-target-libstdc++-v3 all-target-libiberty
configure-target-libstub: $(ALL_GCC_C)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [patch] remove references to librx from top level
2002-06-19 10:15 [patch] remove references to librx from top level Nathanael Nerode
@ 2002-06-19 10:42 ` DJ Delorie
2002-06-19 11:32 ` law
2002-06-19 16:07 ` DJ Delorie
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: DJ Delorie @ 2002-06-19 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: neroden; +Cc: gcc-patches, gdb-patches, binutils
IIRC librx was originally needed for libstdc++ (pre-v3). I can't find
any traces of it either. Anyone else know of a reason why librx used
to be around?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] remove references to librx from top level
2002-06-19 10:42 ` DJ Delorie
@ 2002-06-19 11:32 ` law
2002-06-20 1:10 ` Manfred Hollstein
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: law @ 2002-06-19 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: DJ Delorie; +Cc: neroden, gcc-patches, gdb-patches, binutils
In message <200206191742.g5JHgXV14139@greed.delorie.com>, DJ Delorie writes:
>
> IIRC librx was originally needed for libstdc++ (pre-v3). I can't find
> any traces of it either. Anyone else know of a reason why librx used
> to be around?
librx was indeed used for the old (pre-v3) libstdc++ library. It can
probably be zapped now.
jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] remove references to librx from top level
2002-06-19 11:32 ` law
@ 2002-06-20 1:10 ` Manfred Hollstein
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Manfred Hollstein @ 2002-06-20 1:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Law; +Cc: DJ Delorie, neroden, gcc-patches, gdb-patches, binutils
On Wed, 2002-06-19 at 20:35, law@redhat.com wrote:
> In message <200206191742.g5JHgXV14139@greed.delorie.com>, DJ Delorie writes:
> >
> > IIRC librx was originally needed for libstdc++ (pre-v3). I can't find
> > any traces of it either. Anyone else know of a reason why librx used
> > to be around?
> librx was indeed used for the old (pre-v3) libstdc++ library. It can
> probably be zapped now.
Well, it was actually needed for libg++, but since that lib is dead
now, too, I agree that librx can be eliminated.
> jeff
Cheers.
l8er
manfred
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] remove references to librx from top level
2002-06-19 10:15 [patch] remove references to librx from top level Nathanael Nerode
2002-06-19 10:42 ` DJ Delorie
@ 2002-06-19 16:07 ` DJ Delorie
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: DJ Delorie @ 2002-06-19 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: neroden; +Cc: gcc-patches, gdb-patches, binutils
> 2002-06-19 Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>
> * configure.in: Remove references to librx.
> * Makefile.in: Remove references to librx.
Approved and applied.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-06-20 8:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-06-19 10:15 [patch] remove references to librx from top level Nathanael Nerode
2002-06-19 10:42 ` DJ Delorie
2002-06-19 11:32 ` law
2002-06-20 1:10 ` Manfred Hollstein
2002-06-19 16:07 ` DJ Delorie
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox