From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
To: Nick Clifton <nickc@cambridge.redhat.com>
Cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Add support for RedBoot SWIs to ARM Simulator
Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 04:11:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200205091111.MAA22264@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "09 May 2002 12:00:35 BST." <m3n0v9h9gs.fsf@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com>
> Hi Richard,
>
> > This may trample on the toes of somebody using that SWI as a real
> > trap into an OS.
>
> Well it would if they were then trying to run code compiled for that
> OS on the simulator.
>
> > We probably should have a way of configuring the simulator at
> > run-time to allow emulation of a set of SWI values. Either from a
> > command-line switch (for the arm-...-run command) or a gdb hook (for use
> > within gdb).
>
> > Something like:
> >
> > arm-elf-run -emul-swi={redboot|angel|demon|none}
>
> Hmm, well that could be done. Personally I would hold off doing it
> until there is actually a situation where it is needed. At the moment
> support all three SWI interfaces simultaneously is not a problem. So
> unless someone comes up with a real situation where it causes problems
> I would leave things as they are. (Just my 2 cents worth).
>
> Cheers
> Nick
>
Actually, we already have. Look at the mess that is involved with
testing for XScale -- saying that XScale doesn't support Demon swi's is
nonsence -- especially when we default to enabling XScale extensions for
some simulations. I ran into something like this only the other day --
the simulator was turning on XScale (despite the fact that I wasn't using
any of those extensions), and thus disabling the SWIs I wanted.
Note the comment at the top of ARMul_OSHandleSWI which really gives the
game away:
/* Intel do not want DEMON SWI support. */
if (state->is_XScale)
...
R.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-09 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-09 3:09 Nick Clifton
2002-05-09 3:22 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-09 4:00 ` Nick Clifton
2002-05-09 4:11 ` Richard Earnshaw [this message]
2002-05-16 9:16 ` Add support for target switches in simulator Nick Clifton
2002-05-16 9:25 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-17 1:58 ` Nick Clifton
2002-05-17 5:37 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-17 6:46 ` Nick Clifton
2002-05-17 10:17 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-17 7:33 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2002-05-17 10:29 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-16 9:36 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2002-05-16 11:08 ` Michael Snyder
2002-05-17 11:32 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-20 6:11 ` Nick Clifton
2002-05-20 7:12 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-05-20 7:19 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-05-20 7:26 ` Nick Clifton
2002-05-09 7:35 ` Add support for RedBoot SWIs to ARM Simulator Frank Ch. Eigler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200205091111.MAA22264@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=rearnsha@arm.com \
--cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=nickc@cambridge.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox