From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
To: fnasser@redhat.com
Cc: ac131313@cygnus.com, drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfa:testsuite} Overhaul sizeof.exp
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 09:49:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200202201749.g1KHnlv04009@duracef.shout.net> (raw)
It sounds like we understand the alternatives and everyone's got opinions
about them.
[0] Status quo
[1] FAIL the test
[2] XFAIL the test
[3] KFAIL the test
I'm concerned that for each alternative, someone will find a flaw, and
therefore we'll stick with [0] and keep rejecting useful tests.
Fernando and Daniel and Andrew, I'd like to hold your feet to the fire:
Can you please rank these in priority order and indicate how many of the
high priority ones are acceptable.
Also there may very well be a [4] that I haven't heard of or thought of.
My rank is [2] > [1] > [3] > [0]. [2], [1], and [3] are acceptable to me.
[0] is not.
Michael C
next reply other threads:[~2002-02-20 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-20 9:49 Michael Elizabeth Chastain [this message]
2002-02-20 10:06 ` Fernando Nasser
2002-02-20 10:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-02-20 10:07 ` Richard Earnshaw
2002-02-20 10:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-02-20 10:18 ` Fernando Nasser
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-20 10:24 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-02-20 11:48 ` Fernando Nasser
2002-02-20 9:17 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-02-20 9:42 ` Fernando Nasser
2002-02-20 10:20 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-20 8:59 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-02-19 20:57 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-02-20 6:57 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-20 7:21 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-20 8:19 ` Fernando Nasser
2002-02-20 17:57 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-20 8:16 ` Fernando Nasser
2002-02-20 8:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-02-20 9:24 ` Fernando Nasser
2002-02-21 14:04 ` Jim Blandy
2002-02-21 14:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-02-19 20:43 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-02-21 14:03 ` Jim Blandy
2002-02-19 15:46 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-02-19 18:19 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-19 15:17 Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200202201749.g1KHnlv04009@duracef.shout.net \
--to=mec@shout.net \
--cc=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=fnasser@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox