From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Cc: "Martin M. Hunt" <hunt@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA] fix for utils.c bool problem
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 07:57:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020208105750.A16802@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020207163944.A30605@nevyn.them.org>
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 04:39:44PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 01:32:53PM -0800, Martin M. Hunt wrote:
> > Am I the only one seeing this? On three different build systems I am getting errors like
> >
> > gcc -c -g -O2 -I/usr/include/v9 -I. -I../../src/gdb -I../../src/gdb/config -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../../src/gdb/../include/opcode -I../../src/gdb/../readline/.. -I../bfd -I../../src/gdb/../bfd -I../../src/gdb/../include -I../intl -I../../src/gdb/../intl -DMI_OUT=1 -DGDBTK -DUI_OUT=1 -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type -Wcomment -Wtrigraphs -Wformat -Wparentheses -Wpointer-arith -Wuninitialized ../../src/gdb/utils.c
> > In file included from /usr/progressive/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.5/2.96-gnupro-00r1/include/curses.h:5,
> > from ../../src/gdb/utils.c:30:
> > /usr/include/curses.h:69: conflicting types for `_Bool'
> > /usr/progressive/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.5/2.96-gnupro-00r1/include/stdbool.h:41: previous declaration of `_Bool'
> >
> > Some newer versions of gcc apparently have stdbool.h improvements that
> > fix the problem. Another fix is to simply reorder the patch, which fixes builds
> > on all of my systems (Windows, Linux, Solaris)
>
> This is the patch I alluded to earlier today on binutils@. It's not
> quite complete, since TUI is also affected; I've attached mine. I'm
> quite surprised that this fixes the problem for you without the
> corresponding bfd patch that I haven't committed yet!
No one objected, so I've committed this. As far as I know GDB should
build everywhere it used to before I started playing with bool, as long
as you update both BFD and GDB. If I'm wrong, please let me know.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-08 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-07 13:33 Martin M. Hunt
2002-02-07 13:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-02-07 14:01 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-07 14:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-02-07 15:28 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-08 7:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2002-02-08 8:51 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-08 8:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-02-08 9:09 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-08 9:38 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-02-08 10:55 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-28 22:04 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-07 13:40 ` Fernando Nasser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020208105750.A16802@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=hunt@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox