* Re: [PATCH] fix test script ERRORs in 5.1 branch
@ 2002-01-13 20:17 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain @ 2002-01-13 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ac131313, drow; +Cc: gdb-patches
> Michael, pulling the test cases over doesn't worry me. Er, almost. The
> trunk contains some recently OBSOLETE code so you'd need care there.
Cool.
I plan to keep testing and reporting on gdb_5_1-2001-07-29-branch
for a little while longer, just in case another release might come
from it.
The real work is proportional to:
delta # of changes in test results
absolute # of ERRORs and WARNINGs
Michael C
(working on my weekend report right now)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] fix test script ERRORs in 5.1 branch
@ 2002-01-13 19:47 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-01-13 19:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain @ 2002-01-13 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
I'd like to request approval to port this test script patch
from mainline to the 5.1 branch:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-cvs/2001-10/msg00156.html
This looks like an obvious fix to me, but I want to be conservative about
changing the branch. Note that the only changes are in test suite files.
My motivation: I run test suites on both mainline and 5.1 branch and
I write explanations of every ERROR and WARNING. It will make my life
easier to remove ERRORs from the 5.1 branch, because then I won't have
to keep seeing them and keep checking that they are the same error as
the last test suite run.
Michael C
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] fix test script ERRORs in 5.1 branch
2002-01-13 19:47 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
@ 2002-01-13 19:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-01-13 20:10 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2002-01-13 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 09:47:27PM -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> I'd like to request approval to port this test script patch
> from mainline to the 5.1 branch:
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-cvs/2001-10/msg00156.html
>
> This looks like an obvious fix to me, but I want to be conservative about
> changing the branch. Note that the only changes are in test suite files.
>
> My motivation: I run test suites on both mainline and 5.1 branch and
> I write explanations of every ERROR and WARNING. It will make my life
> easier to remove ERRORs from the 5.1 branch, because then I won't have
> to keep seeing them and keep checking that they are the same error as
> the last test suite run.
My impression is that Andrew's leaning more towards a 5.2 release than
a 5.1.1 release, so I don't know if it would be worth the effort...
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] fix test script ERRORs in 5.1 branch
2002-01-13 19:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2002-01-13 20:10 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-01-13 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: gdb-patches
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 09:47:27PM -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
>
>> I'd like to request approval to port this test script patch
>> from mainline to the 5.1 branch:
>>
>> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-cvs/2001-10/msg00156.html
>>
>> This looks like an obvious fix to me, but I want to be conservative about
>> changing the branch. Note that the only changes are in test suite files.
>>
>> My motivation: I run test suites on both mainline and 5.1 branch and
>> I write explanations of every ERROR and WARNING. It will make my life
>> easier to remove ERRORs from the 5.1 branch, because then I won't have
>> to keep seeing them and keep checking that they are the same error as
>> the last test suite run.
>
>
> My impression is that Andrew's leaning more towards a 5.2 release than
> a 5.1.1 release, so I don't know if it would be worth the effort...
Or the political compromize: Spin what ever is at the head of the 5.1
branch as 5.1.1 while simultaneously cutting the branch for 5.2.
Michael, pulling the test cases over doesn't worry me. Er, almost. The
trunk contains some recently OBSOLETE code so you'd need care there.
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-01-14 4:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-01-13 20:17 [PATCH] fix test script ERRORs in 5.1 branch Michael Elizabeth Chastain
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-01-13 19:47 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-01-13 19:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-01-13 20:10 ` Andrew Cagney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox