* linux-core support broke i386 compilation
@ 2002-01-09 12:20 Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-01-09 12:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-01-09 12:49 ` Michael Snyder
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2002-01-09 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches, msnyder
You reference a type 'gdb_fpxregset_t'. It doesn't appear to be defined
anywhere.
I'm also not sure that that's the right #ifdef for the check; PowerPC was
sounding like it would have an fpxregset (well, an xregset, really - no FP
involved) but without PTRACE_GETFPXREGS. fill_fpxregset also appears to
lack a prototype.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-core support broke i386 compilation
2002-01-09 12:20 linux-core support broke i386 compilation Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2002-01-09 12:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-01-09 14:32 ` Michael Snyder
2002-01-09 12:49 ` Michael Snyder
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2002-01-09 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches, msnyder
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 03:21:10PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> involved) but without PTRACE_GETFPXREGS. fill_fpxregset also appears to
> lack a prototype.
... not to mention, is static.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-core support broke i386 compilation
2002-01-09 12:20 linux-core support broke i386 compilation Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-01-09 12:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2002-01-09 12:49 ` Michael Snyder
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Snyder @ 2002-01-09 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: gdb-patches
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> You reference a type 'gdb_fpxregset_t'. It doesn't appear to be defined
> anywhere.
>
> I'm also not sure that that's the right #ifdef for the check; PowerPC was
> sounding like it would have an fpxregset (well, an xregset, really - no FP
> involved) but without PTRACE_GETFPXREGS. fill_fpxregset also appears to
> lack a prototype.
Nuts! Forgot a file. Comes from having too many outstanding patches in
my source directory.
Fix checked in, PATCH posting coming.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-core support broke i386 compilation
2002-01-09 12:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2002-01-09 14:32 ` Michael Snyder
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Snyder @ 2002-01-09 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: gdb-patches
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 03:21:10PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > involved) but without PTRACE_GETFPXREGS. fill_fpxregset also appears to
> > lack a prototype.
>
> ... not to mention, is static.
I didn't do so great a job with this checkin, did I? ;-(
OK, I'll have that fixed momentarily.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-01-09 22:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-01-09 12:20 linux-core support broke i386 compilation Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-01-09 12:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-01-09 14:32 ` Michael Snyder
2002-01-09 12:49 ` Michael Snyder
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox