Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFA: GCC stabs don't contain prototype info
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 19:47:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011126224801.A2633@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011127034423.DF2B75E9D8@zwingli.cygnus.com>

On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 10:44:23PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote:
> 
> This comes as a bit of a surprise to me, but it seems that stabs
> generated by GCC don't indicate whether a given function was defined
> with a prototype or not.  The argument types should appear after the
> return types, each preceded by a semicolon, but for the following
> input program:
> 
>         int foo (int a, float b) { return a + b; }
> 
> `gcc -save-temps -O2 -g -c' generates the following relevant stabs:
> 
>     .stabs "int:t(0,1)=r(0,1);0020000000000;0017777777777;",128,0,0,0
>     .stabs "float:t(0,12)=r(0,1);4;0;",128,0,0,0
>     .stabs "foo:F(0,1)",36,0,1,foo
>     .stabs "a:P(0,1)",64,0,1,8
>     .stabs "b:P(0,12)",64,0,1,9
>     .stabs "",36,0,0,.LLscope0-foo
>             .stabs "",100,0,0,.Letext
> 
> There is no no prototype info here.  There's no way for GDB to know
> that the function expects its second argument to be passed as a float,
> not promoted to a double, as the K&R-style rules specify.

Is there a standard stabs convention for this?  If so, it would be a
good idea to make development GCC emit it.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFA: GCC stabs don't contain prototype info
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 11:07:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011126224801.A2633@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20011113110700.ZhWnsYbVEqGaSYntQb2SCZar87GIIRoZvvlRd-BGxEE@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011127034423.DF2B75E9D8@zwingli.cygnus.com>

On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 10:44:23PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote:
> 
> This comes as a bit of a surprise to me, but it seems that stabs
> generated by GCC don't indicate whether a given function was defined
> with a prototype or not.  The argument types should appear after the
> return types, each preceded by a semicolon, but for the following
> input program:
> 
>         int foo (int a, float b) { return a + b; }
> 
> `gcc -save-temps -O2 -g -c' generates the following relevant stabs:
> 
>     .stabs "int:t(0,1)=r(0,1);0020000000000;0017777777777;",128,0,0,0
>     .stabs "float:t(0,12)=r(0,1);4;0;",128,0,0,0
>     .stabs "foo:F(0,1)",36,0,1,foo
>     .stabs "a:P(0,1)",64,0,1,8
>     .stabs "b:P(0,12)",64,0,1,9
>     .stabs "",36,0,0,.LLscope0-foo
>             .stabs "",100,0,0,.Letext
> 
> There is no no prototype info here.  There's no way for GDB to know
> that the function expects its second argument to be passed as a float,
> not promoted to a double, as the K&R-style rules specify.

Is there a standard stabs convention for this?  If so, it would be a
good idea to make development GCC emit it.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-11-26 19:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-11-26 19:43 Jim Blandy
2001-11-13 10:56 ` Jim Blandy
2001-11-26 19:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2001-11-13 11:07   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-26 20:19   ` Jim Blandy
2001-11-13 15:38     ` Jim Blandy
2001-11-27 14:16     ` Michael Snyder
2001-11-15  7:01       ` Michael Snyder
2001-11-15  8:00       ` Daniel Berlin
2001-11-27 14:27         ` Daniel Berlin
2001-11-27 20:49         ` Jim Blandy
2001-11-16 10:45           ` Jim Blandy
2001-11-27 14:10 ` Michael Snyder
2001-11-15  2:38   ` Michael Snyder
2001-12-07 13:17 ` Jim Blandy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011126224801.A2633@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox