From: Jason Molenda <jason-swarelist@molenda.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [RFA] A few ui_out formatting bugs with commands-on-breakpoints
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2001 23:40:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010907234014.A10697@shell17.ba.best.com> (raw)
Hi, it looks like there were a few small oversights in the ui
support of printing-commands-on-breakpoints. With the current gdb,
you enter these commands:
(gdb) b main
(gdb) comm
> if $testval == 0
> print "true"
> else
> print "false"
> end
> print "done"
> end
(gdb)
And this is how it's printed:
(gdb) info br
Num Type Disp Enb Address What
1 breakpoint keep y 0x08071a9e in main at ../../src3/gdb/main.c:714
if if $testval == 0
print "true"
elseelse
print "false"
end end
print "done"
(gdb)
Not quite ideal. :-) With the attached patch, the output is
(gdb) info br
Num Type Disp Enb Address What
1 breakpoint keep y 0x08070f30 in captured_command_loop
at ../../src2/gdb/main.c:1
if $testval == 0
print "true"
else
print "false"
end
print "done"
(gdb)
The 'while' command has a similar problem. There aren't any
testsuite regressions with this change.
My only concern is that I'm unfamiliar with the UI_OUT suite of
functions. Are certain ui_out functions are preferred over others?
For instance, we have "end" printed out by both ui_out_field_string()
and by ui_out_text(). I removed the first occurrence in each case,
but who knows, maybe there's a reason to do it the other way. From
what I can tell in the uiout doco, it's six of one and half a dozen
of the other.
Jason
From kettenis@wins.uva.nl Sat Sep 08 03:19:00 2001
From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@wins.uva.nl>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH] Add forward declaration of `struct block' to gdbtypes.h
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2001 03:19:00 -0000
Message-id: <200109081019.f88AJOO00300@delius.kettenis.local>
X-SW-Source: 2001-09/msg00103.html
Content-length: 865
See the #include file policy "discussion" on the discussion list.
This makes `gdbtypes.h' (more) self-contained without sucking in
`symtab.h'.
Checked in.
Mark
Index: ChangeLog
from Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
* gdbtypes.h (struct block): Add forward declaration.
Index: gdbtypes.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/gdbtypes.h,v
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -p -r1.15 gdbtypes.h
--- gdbtypes.h 2001/09/05 23:07:32 1.15
+++ gdbtypes.h 2001/09/08 10:16:03
@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@
#if !defined (GDBTYPES_H)
#define GDBTYPES_H 1
+/* Forward declarations for prototypes. */
+struct block;
+
/* Codes for `fundamental types'. This is a monstrosity based on the
bogus notion that there are certain compiler-independent
`fundamental types'. None of these is well-defined (how big is
next reply other threads:[~2001-09-07 23:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-07 23:40 Jason Molenda [this message]
2001-09-08 11:06 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-09-09 7:51 ` Jackie Smith Cashion
2001-09-09 9:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010907234014.A10697@shell17.ba.best.com \
--to=jason-swarelist@molenda.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox