From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Style "pwd" output
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2019 08:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ee4bd6b-4cdf-f3a9-74af-0843bf123a8b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190605020116.1550-1-tom@tromey.com>
On 6/5/19 3:01 AM, Tom Tromey wrote:
> This changes the "pwd" command to style its output.
> Tested on x86-64 Fedora 29.
>
> gdb/ChangeLog
> 2019-06-04 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
>
> * cli/cli-cmds.c (pwd_command): Style output.
>
> gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
> 2019-06-04 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
>
> * gdb.base/style.exp: Test "pwd".
> ---
> gdb/ChangeLog | 4 ++++
> gdb/cli/cli-cmds.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog | 4 ++++
> gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/style.exp | 2 ++
> 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/cli/cli-cmds.c b/gdb/cli/cli-cmds.c
> index 09f932c2d21..658b08e49a6 100644
> --- a/gdb/cli/cli-cmds.c
> +++ b/gdb/cli/cli-cmds.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
> #include "cli/cli-script.h"
> #include "cli/cli-setshow.h"
> #include "cli/cli-cmds.h"
> +#include "cli/cli-style.h"
> #include "cli/cli-utils.h"
>
> #include "extension.h"
> @@ -337,11 +338,14 @@ pwd_command (const char *args, int from_tty)
> error (_("Error finding name of working directory: %s"),
> safe_strerror (errno));
>
> - if (strcmp (cwd.get (), current_directory) != 0)
> - printf_unfiltered (_("Working directory %s\n (canonically %s).\n"),
> - current_directory, cwd.get ());
> - else
> - printf_unfiltered (_("Working directory %s.\n"), current_directory);
> + fputs_filtered (_("Working directory "), gdb_stdout);
> + fputs_styled (current_directory, file_name_style.style (), gdb_stdout);
> + if (strcmp (cwd.get (), current_directory) == 0)
> + {
> + fputs_filtered (_("\n (canonically "), gdb_stdout);
> + fputs_styled (cwd.get (), file_name_style.style (), gdb_stdout);
> + }
> + fputs_filtered (".\n", gdb_stdout);
Seems fine to me.
I wish we didn't have to split the lines across different calls though.
I know we don't officially do i18n yet (*), but these kinds of changes will
only make it more difficult to get there.
Maybe with something like:
if (strcmp (cwd.get (), current_directory) != 0)
printf_unfiltered (_("Working directory <style=filename>%s<style/>\n (canonically <style=filename>%s<style/>).\n"),
current_directory, cwd.get ());
else
printf_unfiltered (_("Working directory <style=filename>%s<style/>.\n"), current_directory);
I'm sure you've considered something like that; I think we've discussed it
before. What are your current thoughts?
(*) - I don't think there's any real blocker other than someone
figuring out the process. We should just do with that binutils
folks do, I suppose.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-05 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-05 2:01 Tom Tromey
2019-06-05 8:36 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2019-06-05 13:42 ` Tom Tromey
2019-06-05 15:21 ` Pedro Alves
2019-06-05 18:12 ` ui_out format strings for fields and styles (Re: [PATCH] Style "pwd" output) Pedro Alves
2019-06-05 20:27 ` Tom Tromey
2019-06-05 20:39 ` Pedro Alves
2019-06-05 20:42 ` Pedro Alves
2019-06-05 20:49 ` Tom Tromey
2019-06-05 20:47 ` Tom Tromey
2019-06-05 21:25 ` Pedro Alves
2019-06-05 22:21 ` Tom Tromey
2019-06-06 15:49 ` Pedro Alves
2019-06-06 23:55 ` Tom Tromey
2019-06-07 18:27 ` Tom Tromey
2019-06-07 19:20 ` Tom Tromey
2019-07-01 12:23 ` Pedro Alves
2019-07-01 12:55 ` Pedro Alves
2019-07-01 13:06 ` Pedro Alves
2019-07-01 17:26 ` Tom Tromey
2019-07-01 19:24 ` [users/palves/format_strings] Down with .ptr() (Re: ui_out format strings for fields and styles (Re: [PATCH] Style "pwd" output)) Pedro Alves
2019-07-01 13:17 ` ui_out format strings for fields and styles (Re: [PATCH] Style "pwd" output) Pedro Alves
2019-07-01 13:20 ` Pedro Alves
2019-07-01 17:38 ` Tom Tromey
2019-07-01 18:49 ` Tom Tromey
2019-07-01 18:56 ` Pedro Alves
2019-07-01 19:30 ` [users/palves/format_strings] Document the gdb-specific formatters Pedro Alves
2019-07-01 19:25 ` [users/palves/format_strings] Introduce string_field Pedro Alves
2019-07-01 17:43 ` ui_out format strings for fields and styles (Re: [PATCH] Style "pwd" output) Tom Tromey
2019-07-01 19:29 ` [users/palves/format_strings] Make printf_filtered support the gdb-specific formatters too Pedro Alves
2019-07-01 12:01 ` ui_out format strings for fields and styles (Re: [PATCH] Style "pwd" output) Pedro Alves
2019-07-01 12:25 ` Tom Tromey
2019-07-01 12:37 ` Pedro Alves
2019-07-01 17:20 ` Tom Tromey
2019-07-01 19:27 ` [users/palves/format_strings] %pS/%pN -> %p[/%p] Pedro Alves
2019-07-01 19:32 ` ui_out format strings for fields and styles (Re: [PATCH] Style "pwd" output) Philippe Waroquiers
2019-07-03 12:20 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1ee4bd6b-4cdf-f3a9-74af-0843bf123a8b@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tom@tromey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox