From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>, Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
Cc: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add DISABLE_COPY_AND_ASSIGN
Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 18:45:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19cd9fec-2b41-e827-0d51-b2a1b0680808@ericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <075e7089-199f-f251-c4a2-58099b5f06e9@redhat.com>
On 2017-07-18 05:38 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
>
> On 07/18/2017 04:13 PM, Yao Qi wrote:
>> Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>>> Yes, please. I've been meaning to add something like this for a while.
>>>
>>> IMO, this could go in include/ansidecl.h, with a fallback version for
>>> #if __cplusplus < C++11 that declares the methods without =delete (you
>>> get a link error instead).
>>>
>>
>> I thought about adding this into include/, but can't find the right
>> file. I'll move the macro to include/ansidecl.h.
>
> Thanks. Note that that file is maintained by gcc.
>
>>
>>>> /* Pull in gdb::unique_xmalloc_ptr. */
>>>> #include "common/gdb_unique_ptr.h"
>>>>
>>>> +#define DISABLE_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(TYPE) \
>>>> + TYPE (const TYPE&) = delete; \
>>>> + void operator= (const TYPE &) = delete;
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Should this have an intro comment?
>>>
>>
>> I thought it is too simple to have a comment :) How about this?
>>
>> /* A macro to disable the copy constructor and assignment operator.
>> When building with C++ 11, explicitly delete these methods.
>> Otherwise, place this macro in the private: declarations of a class. */
>
> How about this tweak:
>
> /* A macro to disable the copy constructor and assignment operator.
> When building with C++11 and above, the methods are explicitly
> deleted, causing a compile-time error if something tries to copy.
> For C++03, this just declares the methods, causing a link-time
> error if the methods end up called (assuming you don't
> define them). For C++03, for best results, place the macro
> under the private: access specifier, so that most attempts at
> copy are caught at compile-time. */
>
> Thanks,
> Pedro Alves
>
Hi Yao,
Out of curiosity, did you make any progress on this?
Thanks,
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-09 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-18 13:48 Yao Qi
2017-07-18 14:22 ` Pedro Alves
2017-07-18 15:13 ` Yao Qi
2017-07-18 15:38 ` Pedro Alves
2017-09-09 18:45 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2017-09-15 12:05 ` Yao Qi
2017-09-19 9:13 ` Yao Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19cd9fec-2b41-e827-0d51-b2a1b0680808@ericsson.com \
--to=simon.marchi@ericsson.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox