* Re: Patch: gdb -vs- Debian 2.0 [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.10.9911190919190.4001-100000@hpcll168.cup.hp.com> @ 1999-11-19 10:00 ` Tom Tromey [not found] ` <19991119185237.A1A271B493@ocean.lucon.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Tom Tromey @ 1999-11-19 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jimmy Guo; +Cc: Tom Tromey, gdb-patches Jimmy> One more bit of information -- gdb used to compile on Linux Jimmy> Redhat 5.1 (the PC cannot be upgraded to more recent versions Jimmy> due to onboard SCSI controller <-> Linux driver problem), but Jimmy> some time ago quite recently I have to compile gdb on Linux Jimmy> Redhat 6.0, probably due to the same change Tom's patch is Jimmy> trying to fix. Was the problem that PTRACE_GETREGS was not defined? If so, then that is a slightly different problem, with a slightly different fix. PTRACE_GETREGS is defined on my machine, it just doesn't work. Tom ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <19991119185237.A1A271B493@ocean.lucon.org>]
* Re: Patch: gdb -vs- Debian 2.0 [not found] ` <19991119185237.A1A271B493@ocean.lucon.org> @ 1999-11-19 10:57 ` Tom Tromey 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Tom Tromey @ 1999-11-19 10:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: H.J. Lu; +Cc: Tom Tromey, Jimmy Guo, gdb-patches >>>>> "HJ" == H J Lu <hjl@lucon.org> writes: HJ> FWIW, the single binary of my gdb 4.17.0.14 works with all Linux HJ> kernels. It detects everything at runtime. That is what my patch does too. Can you say why one might be better or worse? I haven't seen your change here. Tom From tromey@cygnus.com Fri Nov 19 10:58:00 1999 From: Tom Tromey <tromey@cygnus.com> To: Jimmy Guo <guo@cup.hp.com> Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey@cygnus.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: Patch: gdb -vs- Debian 2.0 Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 10:58:00 -0000 Message-id: <199911191858.KAA20022@ferrule.cygnus.com> References: <199911191800.KAA19976@ferrule.cygnus.com> <Pine.LNX.4.10.9911191052490.4001-100000@hpcll168.cup.hp.com> X-SW-Source: 1999-q4/msg00302.html Content-length: 226 >>>>> "Jimmy" == Jimmy Guo <guo@cup.hp.com> writes: Jimmy> Just tried a build on the Redhat 5.1 system ... yes, Jimmy> PTRACE_(GET|SET)[FP]REGS were not defined. My patch doesn't fix this, but it would be easy to fix. T ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1999-11-19 10:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <8766yzgg67.fsf@cygnus.com>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.10.9911190919190.4001-100000@hpcll168.cup.hp.com>
1999-11-19 10:00 ` Patch: gdb -vs- Debian 2.0 Tom Tromey
[not found] ` <19991119185237.A1A271B493@ocean.lucon.org>
1999-11-19 10:57 ` Tom Tromey
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox