* Re: Fortran array patches
@ 1999-01-04 18:23 Andy Vaught
1999-04-01 0:00 ` Andy Vaught
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andy Vaught @ 1999-01-04 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
Of course, only after the patch has actually been *sent* does an alternate
explanation occur-- g77 may be at fault! Running gdb on AIX works fine,
so it looks like g77 is the one that is backwards....
Andy
----------------- XOLD(K,IC,I)=
Andy Vaught .... DO ITERS=1, 10 XOLD(K,IC,I)
andy@maxwell.la.asu.edu | | /CALLMSOLVE(A,B,X,I,ITERS,TOL)+(RANNYU(0)
Arizona State University ======|WRITE(6,'(I5,2X,F12.6)')ITERS,TOL -HALF)
Tempe, Arizona USA OOOOOO \ENDDORETURN PARAMETER(ZERO=1.D0)*TENTH*DELTA
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Fortran array patches
1999-01-04 18:23 Fortran array patches Andy Vaught
@ 1999-04-01 0:00 ` Andy Vaught
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andy Vaught @ 1999-04-01 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
Of course, only after the patch has actually been *sent* does an alternate
explanation occur-- g77 may be at fault! Running gdb on AIX works fine,
so it looks like g77 is the one that is backwards....
Andy
----------------- XOLD(K,IC,I)=
Andy Vaught .... DO ITERS=1, 10 XOLD(K,IC,I)
andy@maxwell.la.asu.edu | | /CALLMSOLVE(A,B,X,I,ITERS,TOL)+(RANNYU(0)
Arizona State University ======|WRITE(6,'(I5,2X,F12.6)')ITERS,TOL -HALF)
Tempe, Arizona USA OOOOOO \ENDDORETURN PARAMETER(ZERO=1.D0)*TENTH*DELTA
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Fortran array patches
[not found] <Pine.SGI.3.96.990104181828.27148A-100000.cygnus.patches.gdb@maxwell.la.asu.edu>
@ 1999-04-01 0:00 ` Stan Shebs
1999-01-31 13:48 ` Stan Shebs
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stan Shebs @ 1999-04-01 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: andy; +Cc: gdb-patches
andy@maxwell.la.asu.edu (Andy Vaught) writes:
> Of course, only after the patch has actually been *sent* does an alternate
> explanation occur-- g77 may be at fault! Running gdb on AIX works fine,
> so it looks like g77 is the one that is backwards....
Yes, this particular convention was set up for the benefit of other
Fortran compilers. Craig Burley keeps saying that g77's debug info
generation needs a bunch of work, and not to worry about what GDB
makes of it yet. So if this is important to you, you might want to
consider delving into g77 a bit.
Stan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Fortran array patches
1999-04-01 0:00 ` Stan Shebs
@ 1999-01-31 13:48 ` Stan Shebs
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stan Shebs @ 1999-01-31 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: andy; +Cc: gdb-patches
andy@maxwell.la.asu.edu (Andy Vaught) writes:
> Of course, only after the patch has actually been *sent* does an alternate
> explanation occur-- g77 may be at fault! Running gdb on AIX works fine,
> so it looks like g77 is the one that is backwards....
Yes, this particular convention was set up for the benefit of other
Fortran compilers. Craig Burley keeps saying that g77's debug info
generation needs a bunch of work, and not to worry about what GDB
makes of it yet. So if this is important to you, you might want to
consider delving into g77 a bit.
Stan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1999-04-01 0:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1999-01-04 18:23 Fortran array patches Andy Vaught
1999-04-01 0:00 ` Andy Vaught
[not found] <Pine.SGI.3.96.990104181828.27148A-100000.cygnus.patches.gdb@maxwell.la.asu.edu>
1999-04-01 0:00 ` Stan Shebs
1999-01-31 13:48 ` Stan Shebs
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox