From: Hannes Domani <ssbssa@yahoo.de>
To: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
"Schimpe, Christina" <christina.schimpe@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] Windows gdb: Implement XState (Intel AVX) support
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 14:49:50 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1971012298.3491204.1784299790735@mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SN7PR11MB7638743217B50615EE8F4754F9C62@SN7PR11MB7638.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Am Freitag, 17. Juli 2026 um 16:16:31 MESZ hat Schimpe, Christina <christina.schimpe@intel.com> Folgendes geschrieben:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Hannes Domani <ssbssa@yahoo.de>
> > Sent: Freitag, 17. Juli 2026 15:47
> > To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Schimpe, Christina
> > <christina.schimpe@intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] Windows gdb: Implement XState (Intel AVX) support
> >
> > Am Freitag, 17. Juli 2026 um 14:54:59 MESZ hat Schimpe, Christina
> > <christina.schimpe@intel.com> Folgendes geschrieben:
> >
> > > Hi Hannes,
> > >
> > > Thank you for working on this.
> > > It appears that this patch uses the same commit message header as
> > > patch #8. Is it intentional that these are separate commits?
> >
> > This one is the gdb part, and #8 is the gdbserver part, that is stated in the
> > title.
>
> Oups, I wonder how I came to that conclusion. Sorry for that.
>
> >
> > > In any case, IMO, commit messages should not have identical headers.
> > > Also, this patch seems big enough for a commit message which is not
> > > header only. :)
>
> This part still stands for the commit message. Since it's not only avx registers,
> I believe it makes sense to share more details here.
Yes, I will do that.
> > > Do any AVX-* specific tests pass on Windows now? If so, it would be
> > > helpful to mention that in the commit message as well.
> >
> > I actually planned to add that info, but forgot.
> >
> > These tests then pass on Windows:
> > gdb.arch/i386-avx.exp
> > gdb.arch/i386-avx512.exp
>
> What's the state for SSE (gdb.arch/i386-sse.exp) ?
i386-sse.exp works since patch #1, it was only a compile issue of the test itself.
I will mention this in the patch as well.
> I also saw you introduced some code for PKRU and the shadow stack pointer.
> We have GDB tests for those registers, too:
> - gdb.arch/i386-pkru.exp
> - gdb.arch/amd64-shadow-stack*.exp
For these I just added the equivalent code as is done on Linux, without really
knowing what they are for.
i386-pkru.exp tells me:
(gdb) print have_pkru()
$1 = 0
(gdb) PASS: gdb.arch/i386-pkru.exp: probe PKRU support
UNSUPPORTED: gdb.arch/i386-pkru.exp: processor does not support protection key feature.
Do only certain CPU's have this register?
And amd64-shadow-stack.exp:
(gdb) print $pl3_ssp
$1 = (void *) 0x0
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.arch/amd64-shadow-stack.exp: test shadow stack support
No idea if that should work, since Windows is supplying data for the $pl3_ssp register.
Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-17 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260712113229.3695246-1-ssbssa.ref@yahoo.de>
2026-07-12 11:32 ` [PATCH 1/8] gdb/testsuite: Add Windows replacement for aligned_alloc Hannes Domani
2026-07-12 11:32 ` [PATCH 2/8] Windows gdb: Use allocated buffer for CONTEXT Hannes Domani
2026-07-12 11:32 ` [PATCH 3/8] Windows gdb: Remove mappings member from windows_per_inferior Hannes Domani
2026-07-12 11:32 ` [PATCH 4/8] Windows gdb: Refactor getting pointer to register inside context Hannes Domani
2026-07-12 11:32 ` [PATCH 5/8] Windows gdb: Prepare XState functions Hannes Domani
2026-07-17 14:41 ` Schimpe, Christina
2026-07-17 15:04 ` Hannes Domani
2026-07-17 15:07 ` Hannes Domani
2026-07-17 16:22 ` Schimpe, Christina
2026-07-12 11:32 ` [PATCH 6/8] Windows gdb: Get available XState features Hannes Domani
2026-07-12 11:32 ` [PATCH 7/8] Windows gdb: Implement XState (Intel AVX) support Hannes Domani
2026-07-17 12:54 ` Schimpe, Christina
2026-07-17 13:46 ` Hannes Domani
2026-07-17 14:16 ` Schimpe, Christina
2026-07-17 14:49 ` Hannes Domani [this message]
2026-07-17 15:26 ` Schimpe, Christina
2026-07-17 16:26 ` Hannes Domani
2026-07-17 19:06 ` Schimpe, Christina
2026-07-18 16:06 ` Hannes Domani
2026-07-12 11:32 ` [PATCH 8/8] Windows gdbserver: " Hannes Domani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1971012298.3491204.1784299790735@mail.yahoo.com \
--to=ssbssa@yahoo.de \
--cc=christina.schimpe@intel.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox