From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@mips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Workaround a FreeBSD ptrace() bug with clearing thread events.
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2018 18:32:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1908872.BAzsX71dkG@ralph.baldwin.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1803020009130.10166@tp.orcam.me.uk>
On Friday, March 02, 2018 12:13:20 AM Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/gdb/fbsd-nat.c b/gdb/fbsd-nat.c
> > index d44950618c..9c87bfed33 100644
> > --- a/gdb/fbsd-nat.c
> > +++ b/gdb/fbsd-nat.c
> > @@ -1163,6 +1163,39 @@ fbsd_resume (struct target_ops *ops,
> > }
> > ptid = inferior_ptid;
> > }
> > +
> > +#if __FreeBSD_version < 1200052
> > + /*
> > + * When multiple threads within a process wish to report STOPPED
> > + * events from wait(), the kernel picks one thread event as the
> > + * thread event to report. The chosen thread event is retrieved via
> > + * PT_LWPINFO by passing the process ID as the request pid. If
> > + * multiple events are pending, then the subsequent wait() after
> > + * resuming a process will report another STOPPED event after
> > + * resuming the process to handle the next thread event and so on.
> > + *
> > + * A single thread event is cleared as a side effect of resuming the
> > + * process with PT_CONTINUE, PT_STEP, etc. In older kernels,
> > + * however, the request pid was used to select which thread's event
> > + * was cleared rather than always clearing the event that was just
> > + * reported. To avoid clearing the event of the wrong LWP, always
> > + * pass the process ID instead of an LWP ID to PT_CONTINUE or
> > + * PT_SYSCALL.
>
> Hmm, doesn't it have to be a run-time check then? Otherwise you're
> basing your decision on the host system GDB has been built for and not one
> it will be run on, which I suppose does not necessarily have to be of the
> same version. Or am I missing anything here?
FreeBSD generally does not support forwards-compatability for binaries (newer
binary on older kernel), only backwards-compatability (older binary on newer
kernel). In this case, using the workaround is also fine on a fixed kernel,
so it doesn't hurt if GDB is compiled on an older system (thus using the
workaround) and then run under a newer kernel.
--
John Baldwin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-02 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-24 0:10 John Baldwin
2018-02-26 4:28 ` Joel Brobecker
2018-02-26 17:25 ` John Baldwin
2018-03-02 0:51 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2018-03-02 18:32 ` John Baldwin [this message]
2018-03-02 20:09 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2018-03-02 22:48 ` John Baldwin
2018-03-03 17:45 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1908872.BAzsX71dkG@ralph.baldwin.cx \
--to=jhb@freebsd.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=macro@mips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox