From: Paul Koning <Paul_Koning@dell.com>
To: drow@false.org
Cc: sandra@codesourcery.com, gdb@sourceware.org,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org, pedro@codesourcery.com
Subject: Re: [remote protocol] support for disabling packet acknowledgement
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:43:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18551.25421.553226.304326@djudge-us-nas.equallogic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080710223312.GA19058@caradoc.them.org>
>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:
Daniel> Sandra asked me to take a stab at explaining the mess we're
Daniel> in. ...
Daniel> I think that if someone wants to design a more reliable
Daniel> protocol than the existing one, they are free to do so, and
Daniel> either layer it under the existing protocol as described
Daniel> above or contribute it to GDB - we're not leaving anyone out
Daniel> in the cold and a new feature doesn't have to meet every
Daniel> possible use case in its first incarnation.
Fair enough. Ok, thanks.
Daniel> This isn't the only problem with the existing protocol in my
Daniel> opinion. It's pretty crufty, but it gets by.
I'd agree with that.
paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-11 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-10 18:59 Sandra Loosemore
2008-07-10 19:09 ` Paul Koning
2008-07-10 19:59 ` Sandra Loosemore
2008-07-10 20:13 ` Paul Koning
2008-07-10 22:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-07-11 0:22 ` Sandra Loosemore
2008-07-11 0:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-07-11 13:43 ` Paul Koning [this message]
2008-07-11 14:35 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
[not found] ` <20080710223312.GA19058__14539.8706700236$1215729298$gmane$org@caradoc.them.org>
2008-07-11 3:05 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2008-07-11 3:25 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-07-11 15:11 ` Pedro Alves
2008-07-11 15:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-07-11 15:54 ` Paul Koning
2008-07-11 17:59 ` Pedro Alves
2008-07-11 18:54 ` Paul Koning
2008-07-11 19:10 ` Pedro Alves
2008-07-25 13:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-07-25 14:14 ` Sandra Loosemore
2008-07-26 5:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-10 17:23 Pedro Alves
2008-07-10 18:44 ` Paul Koning
2008-07-10 19:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-07-25 13:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-08-11 19:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18551.25421.553226.304326@djudge-us-nas.equallogic.com \
--to=paul_koning@dell.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=sandra@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox