From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>, <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make native gdbserver boards no longer be "remote" (in DejaGnu terms)
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 18:58:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17a384d7-255b-e841-437f-6aa2ace2c2d6@ericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1508178928-30820-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com>
On 2017-10-16 02:35 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> This commit finally clears the "isremote" flag in the native-gdbserver
> and native-stdio-gdbserver boards. The goal is to make all "native"
> boards be considered not remote in DejaGnu terms, like the
> native-extended-gdbserver board is too.
>
> DejaGnu automatically considers boards remote if their names don't
> match the local hostname. That means that native-gdbserver and
> native-extended-gdbserver are considered remote by default by DejaGnu,
> even though they run locally. native-extended-gdbserver, however,
> overrides its isremote flag to force it to be not remote. So we are
> in that weird state where native-gdbserver is considered remote, and
> native-extended-gdbserver is considered not remote.
>
> A recent set of commits fixed all the problems (and some more) exposed
> by testing with --target_board=native-gdbserver and
> --target_board=native-stdio-gdbserver with isremote forced off on
> x86-64 GNU/Linux. I believe we're good to go now.
>
> The native-stdio-gdbserver.exp/remote-stdio-gdbserver.exp boards
> required deep non-obvious modifications unfortunately... The problem
> is that if a board is not remote, then DejaGnu doesn't call
> ${board}_spawn / ${board}_exec at all, and the
> native-stdio-gdbserver.exp board relies on those procedures being
> called. To fix that, this commit redesigns how the stdio boards hook
> into the testing framework to spawn gdbserver. IMO, this is a good
> change anyway, because the way its done currently is a bit of a hack,
> and the result turns out to be simpler, even. With this commit, they
> now no longer load the "gdbserver" generic config, and hook at the
> mi_gdb_target_load/gdb_reload level instead, making them more like
> traditional board files.
>
> To share code between native-stdio-gdbserver.exp and
> remote-stdio-gdbserver.exp, a new shared stdio-gdbserver-base.exp file
> is created.
>
> Instead of having each native board clear isremote manually, boards
> source the new "local-base.exp" file.
>
> Simon, I've migrated the text you had in the commit log of your
> version of this change to the testsuite/README file, so that we can
> refer to it. WDYT?
That looks fine to me. Good idea to put that in the README, it will be
easier to refer people to it. I didn't test remote-stdio-gdbserver though,
but I did test native-stdio-gdbserver.
Thanks for doing this!
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-16 18:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-16 18:35 Pedro Alves
2017-10-16 18:58 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2017-10-16 19:27 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17a384d7-255b-e841-437f-6aa2ace2c2d6@ericsson.com \
--to=simon.marchi@ericsson.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox