Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
To: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: MI: Another -var-update bug? [PATCH]
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 23:59:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <17821.38113.889832.231159@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1H2Xe8-0007Mc-Ae@zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su>

 > This patch introduces this for me:
 > 
 >         FAIL: gdb.mi/mi-var-cp.exp: update RX (3)
 > 
 > Do you get this failure to? If yes, can you please fix it?
 > If no, let me know and I'll investigate.

I don't get this failure.

 > > /* FIXME: select_frame could fail */
 > > !       if (fi)
 > > !       {
 > > !         CORE_ADDR pc = get_frame_pc (fi);
 > > !         if (pc <  BLOCK_START (var->root->valid_block) ||
 > > !             pc >= BLOCK_END (var->root->valid_block))
 > > !           within_scope = 0;
 > > !         select_frame (fi);
 > > !       }
 > 
 > The code later in this function is only executed if "within_scope" is
 > true. Would it be better to call select_frame only if within_scope is
 > set to true, like this:
 > 
 >          if (pc <  BLOCK_START (var->root->valid_block) ||
 >              pc >= BLOCK_END (var->root->valid_block))
 >           within_scope = 0;
 >         else
 >           select_frame (fi);

Yes, it looks like the call to select_frame is not needed when the variable is
out of scope.  Daniel also suggested removing the call to reinit_frame_cache.

-- 
Nick                                           http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob


  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-04 23:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-12 11:09 MI: Another -var-update bug? Nick Roberts
2006-12-13  6:32 ` MI: Another -var-update bug? [PATCH] Nick Roberts
2006-12-30 15:06   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-12-30 22:43     ` Nick Roberts
2006-12-31  2:19       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-01-01 16:24         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-01-01 22:13           ` Nick Roberts
2007-01-04 18:51             ` Vladimir Prus
2007-01-04 19:43               ` Nick Roberts
2007-01-04 18:49   ` Vladimir Prus
2007-01-04 23:59     ` Nick Roberts [this message]
2007-01-05  9:10       ` Vladimir Prus
2007-01-05 15:10         ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=17821.38113.889832.231159@kahikatea.snap.net.nz \
    --to=nickrob@snap.net.nz \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=ghost@cs.msu.su \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox