Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
To: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: MI: frozen variable objects
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 21:53:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <17756.56523.353271.828046@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> (raw)


> This patch introduces so called "frozen" variable objects -- variable objects
> that are not implicitly updated by the "-var-update *" command or by
> "-var-update" on parent variable objects.

This explains your previous patch (Variable objects laziness):

+     We do this for frozen varobjs as well, since this
+     function is only called when it's decided that we need
+     to fetch the new value of a frozen variable.  */

I've not experienced a need for such functionality probably because my Emacs
mode is still unreleased and therefore has a very small user base.  Since you
and Daniel J see that it is needed (through Eclipse?) it seems sensible to
install a patch like this (and the earlier one, which I do understand now -
perhaps the ChangeLog could say "Use install_new_value instead of
gdb_value_fetch_lazy").  However, I would just suggest that these changes are
made shortly after the release of GDB 6.6.  That way there is time test them
with frontends that might be using GDB/MI while GDB is still in CVS.

-- 
Nick                                           http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob


             reply	other threads:[~2006-11-16 21:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-16 21:53 Nick Roberts [this message]
2006-11-16 22:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-16 23:07   ` Nick Roberts
2006-11-17 15:19     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-17 20:52       ` Nick Roberts
2006-11-17 21:05         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-17 23:12           ` Nick Roberts
2006-11-18 11:00           ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-11-17  6:25 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-11-17 18:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-11-18  6:59 Nick Roberts
2006-11-16 12:48 Vladimir Prus
2006-11-16 13:58 ` Greg Watson
2006-11-16 15:25   ` Frederic RISS
2006-11-16 15:55     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-16 16:26       ` Frederic RISS
2006-11-16 16:34         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-17 15:21       ` Greg Watson
2006-11-16 18:55     ` Vladimir Prus
2006-11-16 21:36       ` Frédéric Riss
2006-11-17  6:17         ` Vladimir Prus
2006-11-17  8:54           ` Frederic RISS
2006-11-16 18:47   ` Vladimir Prus
2006-11-17 15:09     ` Greg Watson
2006-11-17 15:15       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-17 15:26         ` Greg Watson
2006-11-17 15:33           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-17 15:41             ` Greg Watson
2006-11-17 15:45               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-17 18:16               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-17 15:35         ` Greg Watson
2006-11-17 15:27       ` Vladimir Prus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=17756.56523.353271.828046@kahikatea.snap.net.nz \
    --to=nickrob@snap.net.nz \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=vladimir@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox