From: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
To: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: MI: frozen variable objects
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 21:53:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17756.56523.353271.828046@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> (raw)
> This patch introduces so called "frozen" variable objects -- variable objects
> that are not implicitly updated by the "-var-update *" command or by
> "-var-update" on parent variable objects.
This explains your previous patch (Variable objects laziness):
+ We do this for frozen varobjs as well, since this
+ function is only called when it's decided that we need
+ to fetch the new value of a frozen variable. */
I've not experienced a need for such functionality probably because my Emacs
mode is still unreleased and therefore has a very small user base. Since you
and Daniel J see that it is needed (through Eclipse?) it seems sensible to
install a patch like this (and the earlier one, which I do understand now -
perhaps the ChangeLog could say "Use install_new_value instead of
gdb_value_fetch_lazy"). However, I would just suggest that these changes are
made shortly after the release of GDB 6.6. That way there is time test them
with frontends that might be using GDB/MI while GDB is still in CVS.
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
next reply other threads:[~2006-11-16 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-16 21:53 Nick Roberts [this message]
2006-11-16 22:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-16 23:07 ` Nick Roberts
2006-11-17 15:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-17 20:52 ` Nick Roberts
2006-11-17 21:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-17 23:12 ` Nick Roberts
2006-11-18 11:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-11-17 6:25 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-11-17 18:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-11-18 6:59 Nick Roberts
2006-11-16 12:48 Vladimir Prus
2006-11-16 13:58 ` Greg Watson
2006-11-16 15:25 ` Frederic RISS
2006-11-16 15:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-16 16:26 ` Frederic RISS
2006-11-16 16:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-17 15:21 ` Greg Watson
2006-11-16 18:55 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-11-16 21:36 ` Frédéric Riss
2006-11-17 6:17 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-11-17 8:54 ` Frederic RISS
2006-11-16 18:47 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-11-17 15:09 ` Greg Watson
2006-11-17 15:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-17 15:26 ` Greg Watson
2006-11-17 15:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-17 15:41 ` Greg Watson
2006-11-17 15:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-17 18:16 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-17 15:35 ` Greg Watson
2006-11-17 15:27 ` Vladimir Prus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17756.56523.353271.828046@kahikatea.snap.net.nz \
--to=nickrob@snap.net.nz \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=vladimir@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox