From: Frederic RISS <frederic.riss@st.com>
To: Greg Watson <g.watson@computer.org>
Cc: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>,
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: MI: frozen variable objects
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 15:25:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1163690698.3219.199.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AA29CD66-FC7C-4C4E-B36A-7945B03AC283@computer.org>
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 06:58 -0700, Greg Watson wrote:
> I don't really understand the motivation for putting this kind of
> functionality into gdb. Any GUI that is more than just a front-end
> for gdb will most likely have an internal data structure representing
> the value of the variable, and can retain or manage access to the
> value if required. It seems to me that adding functionality like this
> to gdb just adds to bloat when it is really a GUI function anyway.
The interesting part seems to be the one that hasn't been submited yet
about GDB auto-freezing some values due to archtectural requirements.
The debugger has architectural knowledge and it shouldn't be necessary
to duplicate it in the GUI.
I agree with your general point though. Maybe the functionality
shouldn't be in the debugger, but the information should be available to
the GUI... through varobj properties maybe? Of course this means that
the GUIs have to known about and respect this information.
Fred.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-16 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-16 12:48 Vladimir Prus
2006-11-16 13:58 ` Greg Watson
2006-11-16 15:25 ` Frederic RISS [this message]
2006-11-16 15:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-16 16:26 ` Frederic RISS
2006-11-16 16:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-17 15:21 ` Greg Watson
2006-11-16 18:55 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-11-16 21:36 ` Frédéric Riss
2006-11-17 6:17 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-11-17 8:54 ` Frederic RISS
2006-11-16 18:47 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-11-17 15:09 ` Greg Watson
2006-11-17 15:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-17 15:26 ` Greg Watson
2006-11-17 15:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-17 15:41 ` Greg Watson
2006-11-17 15:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-17 18:16 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-17 15:35 ` Greg Watson
2006-11-17 15:27 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-11-16 21:53 Nick Roberts
2006-11-16 22:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-16 23:07 ` Nick Roberts
2006-11-17 15:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-17 20:52 ` Nick Roberts
2006-11-17 21:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-17 23:12 ` Nick Roberts
2006-11-18 11:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-11-17 6:25 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-11-17 18:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-11-18 6:59 Nick Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1163690698.3219.199.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=frederic.riss@st.com \
--cc=g.watson@computer.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=vladimir@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox